Two claims are construed in golf ball dispute

Posted on December 20, 2007 by MorrisJames Delaware

Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company, C.A. No. 06-091-SLR, November 20, 2007.

Robinson, J.  The court construes two terms relevant to golf ball technology.


The court construes “cover layer having a Shore D hardness” and “core.”  The Court rejects an agreed-upon construction of the limitation “modulus” as not helpful to the jury and directs the parties to work towards agreement on clearer language.

A copy of the full opinion is available here.
Tags:
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/54335
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.