Subpoena conduct allegations result in evidentiary hearing

Posted on May 2, 2008 by Amy A. Quinlan

Digacomm, LLC v. Vehicle Safety & Compliance, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 08-MC-63-JJF, April 29, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Plaintiff petitioned to enforce a subpoena to the Fish and Richardson law firm.  The Court ordered an evidentiary hearing.to resolve professional issues even if the subpoena issues are fully resolved.




 

Plaintiff alleges Fish has ignored the subpoena and Fish alleges it has fully complied.  Plaintiff asserts that the facts presented in Fish’s responsive brief differ from facts relayed to Plaintiff.  The Court acknowledged that lawyering in fast-paced high stakes litigation can wander sometimes from expected professional standards.  The Court will hold an evidentiary hearing to resolve the legal and professional issues, requiring the presence of five counsel identified.

A copy of the full opinion is available here.










 
Tags: , ,
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/126793
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.