Class certification granted in Tricor® antitrust suit

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al. v. Abbott Laboratories, et al., C.A. Nos. 02-1512-SLR, 03-120-SLR, 05-340-SLR, 05-360-SLR (consolidated), August 18, 2008.

Robinson, J.  The Court grants direct purchaser plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.  It grants in part the indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, and the IP Class’s motion for appointment of counsel is granted.

Continue Reading...

Antitrust injury found not amenable to summary judgment practice

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al. v. Abbott Laboratories, et al., C.A. Nos. 02-1512-SLR, 03-120-SLR, 05-340-SLR, 05-360-SLR (consolidated) and 08-155-SLR, August 18, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Court stays state law claims of indirect purchasers and counterclaim plaintiffs in Tricor action.  Defendants' motions for summary judgment on state law claims are likewise denied without prejudice.  Defendants’ motions for summary judgment on relevant market definition are denied.  Defendants’ motion for leave to file a motion for summary judgment on antitrust injury is denied.

Continue Reading...

Evidence of intent to serve the Delaware market overcomes jurisdictional challenge

Power Integrations, Inc., v. BCD Semiconductor Corporation et al., C.A. No. 07-633-JJF-LPS, August 1, 2008.

Stark, J. Motion to dismiss is denied following jurisdictional discovery where evidence shows defendant’s intent and purpose to serve the Delaware market.

Continue Reading...

Case is transferred to Arizona due to a hardship

L’Athene, Inc. v. Earthspring LLC et al., Civ. No. 08-114-SLR, August 7, 2008

Robinson, J.  Motion to dismiss is denied; motion to transfer is granted where litigation in Delaware would cause undue hardship to defendant given the small size of its company.

Continue Reading...

Declaratory judgment action is dismissed due to no controversy alleged

Innovative Therapies, Inc., v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., et al., CA No. 07-589-SLR-LPS, July 14, 2008.

Stark, M. J. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted.

Continue Reading...

Indemnification action survives motion to dismiss

Valeo Sistemas Electricos S.A. DF. C.V., v. CIF Licensing, LLC, d/b/a GE Licensing, CA No. 06-627-GMS, July 11, 2008.

Stark, M. J. Court denies defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim where claims depend on contractual language at issue and language is susceptible of different interpretations.

Continue Reading...

Post-trial evidentiary objections are overruled

Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH, et al, v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-700-JJF, July 15, 2008.

Farnan J. Court rules on certain evidentiary issues raised by both parties during bench trial and denies all objections.

 

Continue Reading...

Damages remitted and enhanced 25% for willfulness; JMOL defenses waived

TruePosition Inc. v. Andrew Corporation, C.A. No. 05-747-SLR, July 31, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion for JMOL or a new trial is denied.  Damages awarded by jury of $45.3 million are remitted to $18.6 million.  Plaintiff’s motion for enhanced damages due to willful infringement is granted in part.  Damages are enhanced by 25% to $23,250,000.  Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees is denied.  Plaintiff’s motion for a permanent injunction is granted.  Prejudgment interest on $18.6 million is awarded, compounded quarterly at the prime rate.  Post-judgment interest on $18.6 million from 9/19/07 (the date of judgment) is awarded at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the calendar week preceding.

Continue Reading...

Braintree Labs survives antitrust and tortious interference challenge

Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Schwarz Pharma, Inc., C.A. No. 03-477-SLR, July 31, 2008.

Robinson, J.   The court rules for plaintiff on unfair competition and antitrust claims after bench trial.

Continue Reading...

Transfer to Georgia is unwarranted

Acuity Brands, Inc., et al., v. Cooper Industries, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 07-444-GMS, July 31, 2008.

Sleet, C.J.  Defendants’ motion to transfer to the Northern District of Georgia is denied.

 

Continue Reading...

Arbitrator's award is upheld

Remote Solution Co., LTD. v. FGH Liquidating Corp. f/k/a Contec Corporation, C.A. No. 06-004-SLR, July 31, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Petitioner’s motion to vacate or modify and arbitration award is denied.  The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1401(b)(2).

Continue Reading...