Delaware Patent Litigation Report : Delaware Intellectual Property Lawyer & Attorney : Morris James Law Firm : Delaware Patent Litigation Report

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 04-1371-JJF, September 24, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Court finds for plaintiff following bench trial on defendants’ claims of inequitable conduct.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Amgen, Inc., et al. v. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 06-259-MPT, September 19, 2008.

Thynge, M.J. The Court issues a claim construction ruling following Markman Hearing.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Cordis Corp. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 97-550-SLR (Consolidated); Boston Scientific Corporation, et al. v. Ethicon, Inc., et al. C.A. No. 98-19-SLR, September 15, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Following decade-long litigation, the Court grants Cordis’ motion for entry of final judgment and denies BSC’s motion for new trial and Medtronic’s motion for JMOL on lost profit damages.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

McKesson Automation, Inc. v. Swisslog Holding AG, et al., C.A. No. 06-28-SLR-LPS, August 29, 2008.

Stark, M.J. Following submission of additional documentation, the Court grants plaintiff’s motion to reconsider its earlier recommendation of dismissal for lack of standing.  Motions by both sides to amend pleadings are granted.  Defendants’ motion to dismiss willfulness claim in light of Seagate is denied.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In Re: ‘318 Patent Infringement Litigation, C.A. No. 05-356-SLR, August 27, 2008.

Robinson, J. Following a bench trial and post-trial briefing, the Court finds the patent-in-suit is invalid for lack of enablement.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Purdue Pharma Products L.P., et al. v. Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 07-255-JJF, August 26, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Court grants non-party’s motion to quash and denies defendants’ application requesting issuance of a letter of request for documents and deposition testimony in Germany under the Hague Convention.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

SRI International Inc. v. Internet Security Systems, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 04-1199-SLR, August 21, 2008.

Robinson, J. Defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment that three of the four patents in suit are invalid is denied.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Siemens Medical SolutionsUSA, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc., C.A. No. 07-190-SLR, August 20, 2008.

Robinson, J. Motion to exclude certain expert testimony is granted. Motion to strike affirmative defense of estoppel is deferred.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link