Willful infringement claim falls on summary judgment

Honeywell International, Inc., et al. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp., et al., C.A. No. 02-359-MPT, November 12, 2008.

Thynge, M.J. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment regarding no willful infringement is granted.

The patents-in-suit related to Controlled Flight Into Terrain technology in the aviation industry.  Plaintiff alleges that there is substantial evidence of willful infringement, including actual knowledge of the patent, appreciation of the risk of infringement as evidenced by the fact that a patent opinion was deemed a major issue but never provided, and that no written record exists to corroborate defendant’s non-infringement analysis.  The Court finds that plaintiff has failed to show that defendants conduct was objectively reckless.  Unrefuted testimony shows that before going to market with the accused product, a patent review was performed and discussed with outside counsel.  The argument that a non-infringement opinion was necessary to prevail on summary judgment of non-willfulness is rejected.  Although defendant moved for summary judgment, the burden of proving willfulness by clear and convincing evidence rests with plaintiff.  Plaintiff was required to and failed to meet this standard to avoid summary judgment.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/126840
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.