Markman decision relies on Patent Appeals Board transcript

Posted on February 4, 2009 by Morris James LLP

Simplification, LLC v. Block Finance Corporation, et al., Civ. No. 03-355-JJF, January 23, 2009.

Farnan, J.  The Court construes 13 disputed terms in two patents following a Markman Hearing.

The Court construes 13 disputed terms for the two patents-in-suit following a Markman Hearing.  The patents pertain to the automation of steps typically associated with the filing of tax returns.  The Court finds the transcript from the oral hearing conducted by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences critical in construing the disputed terms.
Tags: ,
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/126870
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.