Discovery disputes are resolved

In Re: Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation, MDL No. 08-1949, April 27, 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Defendant’s motion to compel certain documents is denied.

The Magistrate resolves certain discovery disputes.  Defendants’ request for documents relating to assignments within the patentee’s IP department of each case or project numbers to which department members were assigned as well as applications within which each project number was assigned for a period of three years is denied with leave to explore through deposition whether it was common to have divided responsibility for U.S. patent prosecution from responsibility for prosecution of related patents in other jurisdictions.  The court finds the burden of production, including translation and privilege review outweighs the minimal marginal relevance.  In addition, plaintiff has adequately explained the basis for “disassembling” documents produced, and is in the process of “reassembling” files in the manner in which they were kept.  Finally, at this time there is no basis to provide relief with respect to a privilege issue relating to the U.S. duty of disclosure.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/133043
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.