Complaint alleging misuse of confidential information survives 12(b)(6) attack

Spear Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Blair & Company, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 07-821-JJF, April 27, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Defendants’ 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss supplemental complaint are denied.

The technology at issue relates to Retin-A® tretinoin cream products used in the treatment of acne and a generic Efudex® product used in the treatment of actinic keratosis.  Plaintiffs disclosed confidential information to defendants subject to a confidentiality agreement and an evaluation agreement in connection with exploring business opportunities.  Defendants filed a Citizen’s Petition seeking to block generic Efudex® products.  Plaintiffs allege breach of contract and the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, trade secret misappropriation, unjust enrichment and negligence.  Defendants move to dismiss asserting the complaint is fatally speculative and that the Citizen’s Petition, which was privileged activity, was not the proximate cause of any harm.  The Court finds Plaintiffs’ complaint to be well plead.  Furthermore, the causal chain is only broken if the intervening cause is unforeseeable and the Court finds that the delay of Plaintiffs’ ANDA as a result of the filing of the Citizen Petition was foreseeable.  Finally, the use of trade secrets in violation of a confidentiality agreement or in breach of a fiduciary duty is not protected.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/132570
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.