Discovery is ordered but limited in light of marginal relevance and burden

Posted on June 10, 2009 by Morris James LLP

In re: Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation, MDL No. 08-1949, Civ. No. 07-807-JJF-LPS, June 3 , 2009(redacted).

Stark, M. J.  Plaintiff’s motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part.

Magistrate judge orders limited discovery of certain documents in ANDA case (including unredacted versions of material already produced) and deposition testimony given that information sought by plaintiff in their motion to compel is only marginally relevant and the burden on defendants is substantial.
Tags: ,
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/138806
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.