Delaware Patent Litigation Report : Delaware Intellectual Property Lawyer & Attorney : Morris James Law Firm : Delaware Patent Litigation Report

Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corporation, et al., Civ. No. 08-779-SLR, July 21, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Hallamore Corporation v. Capco Steel Corporation, Misc. Action No. 08-211-SLR, June 30, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiff’s motion to compel a non-party to attend a deposition and produce documents pursuant to a subpoena issued in Delaware is denied and the subpoena is deemed invalid.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Morris James has launched a new e-discovery blog titled Delaware eDiscovery Report.  Chris Spizzirri's expertise has been described by Gabe's Guide to the e-Discovery Universe as "top notch."  We invite you to check out the blog and follow e-discovery developments.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 08-309-JJF-LPS, July 16, 2009 (Order).

Stark, M. J.  Magistrate Judge issues order outlining claim construction procedures.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp., Civ. No. 08-542-SLR, July 9, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims for false advertising arising under the Lanham Act is granted.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 08-309-JJF-LPS, July 9, 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Decision on cross motions for summary judgment is deferred pending ruling in earlier action.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

American Patent Development Corporation, LLC v. Movielink, LLC, Civil Action No. 07-605-JJF, July 1, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement is granted in part. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement is denied.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al. v. Cobalt Laboratories, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 08-21-GMS-LPS, July 2, 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Magistrate Judge issues Report and Recommendation regarding claim construction.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon Web Services, LLC, Civil Action No. 06-491a-MPT, June 30, 2009.

Thynge, M. J.  Defendant’s motion to strike second declaration by an inventor/expert is moot. The second declaration will not be considered for purposes of summary judgment.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Versata Enterprises, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 07-782-JJF, July 1, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendants’ counterclaims is granted in part and denied in part.  Plaintiff’s motion to strike is also granted in part and denied in part.  Defendants are granted leave to amend their defenses and counterclaims.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon Web Services, LLC, Civil Action No. 06-491-MPT, June 30, 2009.

Thynge, M. J.  Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on defendants’ prosecution laches defense is granted and defendants’ motion relating to this defense is denied.  Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment concerning Amazon’s patent misuse defense is granted in part and denied in part.  Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on a marking issue is denied.  Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on defendants’ § 288 defense is granted.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Accenture Global Services GMBH, et al., v. Guidewire Software Inc., Civ. No. 07-826-SLR, June 30, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss tortious interference with business claim is denied; its motion to amend its answer to allege trade secret misappropriation claim is granted; and its motion to unseal its proposed amended answer is denied.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In Re: Rembrandt Technologies, LP Patent Litigation, MDL Docket No. 07-1848-GMS-LPS, June 29, 2009.

Stark, M.J.  A motion to amend complaint filed by equipment vendors is granted.  The Magistrate Judge further recommends that Rembrandt’s motion to strike or dismiss antitrust counter-counterclaims be denied as moot; and a motion for judgment on the pleadings relating to certain claims filed by the cable defendants be denied.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Roquette Freres v. SPI Pharma, Inc., et al., C. A. No. 06-540-GMS-MPT, June 25, 2009.

Thynge, M. J.  Certain defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction are granted. Motions for leave to file a supplemental answering brief are granted.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Dow Chemical Company v. NOVA Chemicals Corporation and NOVA Chemicals, Inc., Civil Action No. 05-737-JJF, June 25, 2009.

Farnan, J.  The Court construes five of six disputed terms in a 42-page opinion.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

State of Florida, et al., v. Abbott Laboratories, et al., Civ. No. 08-155-SLR, June 23 , 2009.

Robinson, J.  Defendants’ request for discovery relating to rebates received for fenofibrate products is granted.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

SWIMC, Inc. v. Hy-Tech Thermal Solutions, LLC, et al., Civ. No. 08-084-SLR, June 24 , 2009.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery is granted.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link