Plaintiff awarded costs of defending motion for discovery abuse sanctions

Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v. HRD Corporation (d/b/a Marcus Oil & Chemical), Civil Action No. 05-023-JJF, July 30, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion for discovery abuse sanctions is denied with the costs of defending the motion awarded to plaintiff.

This breach of contract litigation arises from a failed business relationship between the parties.  Defendant counterclaimed also for breach of contract and trademark misappropriation. A special discovery master was appointed to assist the parties with their disputes.  Nonetheless, defendant brought this motion alleging eight separate discovery misdeeds, some of which overlap issues addressed by the Special Master.  The Court concludes that plaintiff did not commit sanctionable conduct, although it sometimes acted unreasonably.  However, because the Court previously warned the parties that certain conditions would apply to the continued litigation of the current motion, the Court determined to award costs.  Defendant fell well short of supporting its allegations.  Therefore, plaintiff is awarded the costs of defending the motion for sanctions.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/149542
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.