Claim construction ruling issues in camera lens assembly case

Fujinon Corporation v. Motorola, Inc., Civ. No. 07-533-GMS-LPS, September 11, 2009.

Stark, M.J.  The Magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation regarding claim construction after completion of briefing on March 3, 2009 and a Markman hearing on April 6, 2009.

There are two patents-in-suit directed to lens assemblies for cameras, permitting a compact size suitable for mobile telephones.  The magistrate adopts plaintiff’s proposed definition of “stop” but rejects its reasoning in modifying one of twelve Webster’s Third dictionary definitions of “stop.”  He rejects the notion that a single general dictionary is more probative than the patent’s specification and also rejects defendant’s lexicographer arguments.  He defers construing the terms “near the optical axis,” which is challenged as indefinite, until ruling on case-dispositive motions.  He adopts plaintiff’s construction “within an effective aperture range of the single focus lens” albeit comprised of general dictionary definitions where defendant has offered no alternative.  An indefinite ruling on the terms is deferred. He also construes the term “peripheral region.”

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/156487
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.