Earlier Markman decision is modified and finds two claims indefinite

Girafa.com, Inc. v. IAC Search & Media, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 07-787-SLR, September 25, 2009.

Robinson, J.  The Court amends earlier Markman decision following further review of the disputed terms.

The patent-in-suit discloses a web browser as being the mechanism by which an annotated web page is provided to a user.  After further review, the Court revises earlier Markman decision dated September 15, 2009 based upon its conclusion that the invention is directed to the display of images as compared to the rendering of images for a user’s viewing.  The Court further reverses its prior determination that the reference to “home page” forecloses an invalidity argument based on indefiniteness.  No universal definition of “the home page exists and two claims are invalid as indefinite.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/160705
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.