Transfer motion is denied

Personalized User Model LLP v. Google, Inc., Civil Action No. 09-525-JJF, October 27, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion to transfer venue to the Northern District of California is denied.

After considering both private and public factors, the Court finds both Delaware and the Northern District of California to be appropriate.  However, because the plaintiff chose to file in Delaware and defendant is incorporated and resides in Delaware, defendant cannot argue that it would be unfair to litigate this matter here.  Therefore, transfer is not warranted.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/164405
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.