Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 08-309-JJF-LPS, December 18, 2009.
Stark, M.J. Magistrate recommends granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion to strike defenses and counterclaims of inequitable conduct and patent misuse.
Continue Reading...Qinetiq Limited v. Oclaro, Inc., Civil Action No. 09-372-JAP, December 18, 2009.
Pisano, J. Defendant’s motion to transfer the litigation to the Northern District of California is granted.
Continue Reading...IGT v. Bally Gaming International, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 06-282-SLR, December 22, 2009.
Robinson, J. Plaintiff’s motion for a permanent injunction is denied.
Continue Reading...Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 08-309a-JJF-LPS, December 18, 2009.
Stark, M.J. This is a report and recommendation of the magistrate regarding claim construction of the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit.
Continue Reading...ICU Medical, Inc. v. Rymed Technologies, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-468-JJF, December 16, 2009.
Farnan, J. Defendant's Motion To Modify Scheduling Order And For Leave To File Second Amended Answer and Counter-Plaintiff's Counterclaims is granted. Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To File Sur-Reply is also granted.
Continue Reading...Eurand, Inc., Cephalon, Inc. and Anesta AG v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 08-889-SLR-MPT; Eurand, Inc., Cephalon, Inc. and Anesta AG v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., C.A. No. 09-18-SLR-MPT, December 9, 2009.
Thynge, M.J. Defendant’s request for lab notebooks and other R&D documents relating to a product other that covered by the patent-in-suit is denied. Defendant’s request for disclosure of secondary considerations evidence is granted.
Continue Reading...ICU Medical, Inc. v. Rymed Technologies, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-468-JJF, December 3, 2009.
Farnan, J. The court issues claim constructions.
Continue Reading...Honeywell International, Inc., et al. v. Nikon Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 04-1337-JJF, December 4, 2009.
Farnan, J. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity is granted.
Continue Reading...Mallinckrodt Inc., et al. v. E-Z-EM Inc. and Acist Medical Systems, Inc., C.A. No. 09-228-JJF, December 3, 2009.
Farnan, J. Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended and supplemental complaint is granted; Defendants’ motion to strike is denied as moot.
Continue Reading...Mark IV Industries Corp. v. Transcore, L.P., et al., C.A. No. 09-418-GMS, December 2, 2009.
Sleet, C. J. Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and for bad faith and breach of a settlement agreement is denied.
Continue Reading...Mallinckrodt Inc. and Liebel-Flarsheim Co. v. E-Z-EM Inc. and Acist Medical Systems, Inc., C.A. No. 09-228-JJF, November 20, 2009.
Farnan, J. Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim Under Rule 12(b)(6) is granted as to the indirect infringement claims, but denied as to the direct infringement claim. Plaintiffs will be given leave to amend. Defendants’ Motion to Transfer is denied.
Continue Reading...Teleconference Systems v. Proctor and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Civil No. 09-200-JBS/JS, November 25, 2009.
Schneider, M. J. Cisco's request to stay the Cisco action until its California declaratory judgment action is concluded is denied. Furthermore, Cisco and H-P’s requests to stay and sever plaintiff's customer claims and only transfer plaintiff's claims against Cisco and H-P to California are denied. Except as to the individual defendant, Cisco and H-P’s request to transfer the entirety of these actions to California is granted. Plaintiff's claim against the individual defendant will be severed and stayed and will remain in Delaware.
Continue Reading...Stored Value Solutions Inc. v. Card Activation Technologies Inc., C.A. No. 09-495-JJF, November 20, 2009.
Farnan, J. Defendant’s motion to transfer to the Northern District of Illinois is denied.
Continue Reading...St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., et al., Civ. Act. No. 03-241-JJF, November 19, 2009.
Farnan, J. Plaintiff’s Motion For New Trial On Damages Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 59, Or In The Alternative, Motion For Prejudgment And Post-Judgment Interest will be denied to the extent a new trial is sought and granted to the extent that prejudgment and post-judgment interest is sought. In addition, Plaintiff’s Motion For A New Trial On Infringement will be denied because the Court has not modified it claim construction. The Final Judgment Order in this case will be amended to reflect the Court's prejudgment and post-judgment interest rulings.
Continue Reading...Enter keywords:
For more information concerning any of these cases, contact Mary Matterer at mmatterer@morrisjames.com or 302.888.6960
