Plaintiff's construction of two disputed terms is rejected

Genetics Institute, LLC  v. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Incl., Civ. No.08-290-SLR, February 24, 2010.

Robinson, J.  The Court issues a claims construction for two disputed terms following a Markman Hearing.

The Court rejects plaintiff’s construction of two disputed terms for the patent-in-suit.  Given the well-known purpose of Markush groups, the court interprets the analysis as one limiting, not expanding, the scope of the claim to more specifically define the operative regions of a particular protein known to the applicant at the time.  Plaintiff’s claim construction is supported by neither the case law nor the intrinsic record.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/187492
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.