Magistrate issues recommendation for claims construction

Posted on May 25, 2010 by Morris James LLP

The Research Foundation of State University of New York, et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, L.P., C. A. No.09-184-JJF-LPS, May 12, 2010.

Stark, M. J.  The Magistrate recommends claims construction for ten disputed terms following a Markman hearing.

The matter was referred to the Magistrate for, among other purposes, claim construction.  The Magistrate recommends construction of ten disputed terms for four patents-in-suit making up two district groups.  The patents are directed to methods of treating acne and rosacea and to methods of using tetracycline compounds to inhibit production of nitric oxide ("NO"), a mediator of rosacea.
Tags: ,
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/204058
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.