29 terms are construed for 2 patents in elevator technology dispute

Posted on June 22, 2010 by Morris James LLP

Inventio AG v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Americas Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 08-874-ER, June 14, 2010.

Robreno, J.  (sitting by designation) The Court issues a 103-page Markman decision for 29 disputed terms.

The court construes 29 disputed terms for 2 patents-in-suit.  The patents relate to a “destination call control” elevator system which creates increased efficiency of elevator traffic by eliminating multiple elevator destination stops and elevator car overcrowding.
Tags: ,
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/207847
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.