Claim construction ruling issues in catheter case

B. Braun Melsungen AG, et al. v. Terumo Medical Corporation, et al., C. A. No.09-347-JJF-LPS, June 3, 2010.

Stark, M. J.  The Magistrate recommends construction of seven disputed terms following a Markman Hearing.

The case was referred to the Magistrate for certain purposes, including making recommendations as to the proper construction of disputed claim terms.  The parties have addressed eight claim terms, seven of which are disputed.  The patent-in-suit relates generally to intravenous (IV) catheters, and, in particular, to a safety IV catheter in which the needle tip is automatically covered after needle withdrawal to prevent the healthcare worker from making accidental contact with the needle tip.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/205770
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.