Permanent injunction bid is denied
Cordance Corporation v. Amazon Com., Inc., et al., Civil Action No.06-491a-MPT, July 23, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. Plaintiff’s motion for a permanent injunction after trial is denied.
Continue Reading...Patent misuse and inequitable conduct defenses fail
Cordance Corporation v. Amazon Com., Inc., et al., Civil Action No.06-491-MPT, July 23, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. After trial on inequitable conduct and patent misuse, the court finds in favor of plaintiff.
Continue Reading...Willful infringement is found under Seagate analysis
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., et al., C. A. No.04-1371-JJF, July 22, 2010.
Farnan, J. After trial, the court finds defendant willfully infringed plaintiff’s patents.
Continue Reading...Case is dismissed for lack of standing
Enhanced Security Research, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc., C. A. No.09-871-JJF, July 20, 2010.
Farnan, J. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing is granted.
Continue Reading...Inequitable conduct amendment is permitted after amendment deadline
Bigband Networks, Inc. v. Imagine Communications, Inc., Civil Action No.07-351-JJF, July 20, 2010.
Farnan, J. Defendant’s motion to amend its answer and counterclaims is granted. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the amended inequitable conduct counterclaims is denied.
Continue Reading...Source code of future products is held discoverable
Bigband Networks, Inc. v. Imagine Communications, Inc., Civil Action No.07-351-JJF, July 20, 2010.
Farnan, J. Plaintiff’s motion to compel source code and further responses to written discovery is granted.
Continue Reading...Court enters default judgment but defers ruling on damages
Tristrata Technology, Inc. v. Medical Skin Therapy Reserch, Inc., et al., Civil Action No.06-644-JJF, July 20, 2010.
Farnan, J. Plaintiff’s motion to compel Defendant’s responses to document requests is denied as moot. Plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment is granted.
Continue Reading...Preliminary injunction bid fails
Symbol Technologies LLC v. Janam Technologies, Inc., Civil Action No.08-340-JJF, July 20, 2010.
Farnan, J. Defendant’s motion to preclude evidence of Plaintiff’s profits is denied. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.
Continue Reading...Copyright suit survives dismissal motion
Vianix LLC v. Nuance Communications, Inc., C. A. No.09-348-JJF, July 20, 2010.
Farnan, J. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied.
Continue Reading...Amendment and discovery is permitted in copyright case
Andrew Paul Leonard v. Stemtech Health Sciences, Inc. and John Does 1-100, Civil Action No.08-67-JJF, July 16, 2010.
Farnan, J. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery and motion for leave to file an amended complaint are granted. The court declines to award costs of bringing the motion.
Continue Reading...Motion for reconsideration fails
Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. Neutrogena Corporation, Civ. No.09-642-SLR, July 15, 2010.
Robinson, J. Defendant’s motion for reconsideration of partial summary judgment of liability is denied.
Continue Reading...Amended complaint alleging sales results in jury trial in pharma case
Sepracor Inc. v. Dey L.P. and Dey, Inc., Civil Action No.06-113-JJF, July 15, 2010.
Farnan, J. Plaintiff’s motion to file and amended and supplemental complaint and jury demand is granted.
Continue Reading...Patent case is transferred to California
Boram Pharm. Co., LTD v. Life Technologies Corp., Civil Action No.10-31-HB III, July 14, 2010.
Bartle, J. (sitting by designation) Defendant’s motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of California is granted.
Continue Reading...Fraud count is amended with particulars in copyright/employment case
Le T. Le v. City of Wilmington, et al., Civ. No.08-615-LPS, July 12, 2010.
Stark, M. J. Defendant’s motion to amend the answer to allege with greater particularity Defendant’s fraud claim is granted.
Continue Reading...Eardrop complaint survives motion to dismiss
Deston Therapeutics LLC, et al. v. Trigen Laboratories Inc. and Trisys Inc., Civil No.09-809 (JBS/KW) July 12, 2010.
Simandle, J. (sitting by designation) Defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied.
Continue Reading...Eight terms construed following Markman Hearing
Eppendorf AG, et al. v. Nanosphere Inc., Civil Action No.09-054-MMB July 12, 2010.
Baylson, J. (sitting by designation) The Court issues claims construction on eight disputed terms for the patent-in-suit.
Continue Reading...Attorneys' fees in absence of willful conduct are not awarded
LG Display Co., LTD. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Civil Action No.06-726-JJF and 07-357-JJF July 8, 2010.
Farnan, J. The Court awards damages against plaintiff for infringement together with prejudgment interest. Defendant’s request for attorneys’ fees is denied.
Continue Reading...Generic drug found to infringe
In Re: Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation, MDL No. 08-1949-JJF, June 29, 2010.
Farnan, J. The Court concludes that Apotex may be held liable for infringement as a submitter of an ANDA. Defendants' Motion To Dismiss AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP For Lack of Standing is granted. Judgment will be entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants on the issues of invalidity and unenforceability of the patent-in-suit.
Continue Reading...Motion to file an amended answer and counterclaims is granted
The Research Foundation of State University of New York, et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., C. A. No. 09-184-GMS-LPS, June 28, 2010.
Stark, J. Defendant’s Motion For Leave To File An Amended Answer and Counterclaims is granted.
Continue Reading...Defendant's summary judgment motion for non-infringement is granted
Innovative Patents, L.L.C. and Forcefield, LLC v. Brain-Pad, Inc., C.A. No. 07-680-MPT, June 29, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment of infringement is denied, and defendant's motion for summary judgment of non infringement is granted
Continue Reading...Late request to add marking and inequitable conduct defenses is granted in part
Leader Technologies, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-862a-LPS, June 24, 2010.
Stark, M. J. Defendant’s Motion For Leave To Amend Its Responsive Pleading To Add A Defense And Counterclaim Of Inequitable Conduct And To Amend Its False Marking Counterclaim is granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...
