Eight terms construed following Markman Hearing

Posted on July 15, 2010 by Morris James LLP

Eppendorf AG, et al. v. Nanosphere Inc., Civil Action No.09-054-MMB July 12, 2010.

Baylson, J.  (sitting by designation) The Court issues claims construction on eight disputed terms for the patent-in-suit.

The patent-in-suit claims an efficient and cost-effective method of testing a human tissue sample to determine whether a person has a particular antigen.  The Court construes eight disputed terms following a Markman Hearing on June 10, 2010.
Tags: ,
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/211467
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.