Court enters default judgment but defers ruling on damages

Tristrata Technology, Inc. v. Medical Skin Therapy Reserch, Inc., et al., Civil Action No.06-644-JJF, July 20, 2010.

Farnan, J.  Plaintiff’s motion to compel Defendant’s responses to document requests is denied as moot. Plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment is granted.

The disputed technology involves medical skin therapy.  The Clerk entered a default judgment for failure to answer the complaint.  Defendant was granted leave to conduct damages discovery to which defendant has not responded.  The court enters default judgment against defendant, but reserves decision on the question of damages.  The court orders plaintiff to submit an itemized statement detailing the exact amount of damages it seeks and the basis for those damages, and Defendant will have an opportunity to respond or request a hearing.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/213107
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.