Summary Judgment for non-infringement is granted and granted-in-part on validity

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc., Civ. No.07-272B-SLR, September 14, 2010.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on infringement on the ‘678 patent is denied. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment for non-infringement of the Intermec patents is granted. Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment of validity of the System patents is granted-in-part. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment of infringement and validity of the Terminal patents is granted-in part and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of indefiniteness of certain claims on the ‘678 and 499 patents is granted-in-part.

Continue Reading...

Twelve disputed terms are construed for five of the patents-in-suit

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc., Civ. No.07-272-SLR, September 14, 2010.

Robinson, J.  The Court issues a decision construing twelve disputed terms following a Markman Hearing.

Continue Reading...

Plaintiff's stay request is denied

Oracle Corporation and Oracle U.S.A., Inc. v. Parallel Networks, LLP, Civ. No.06-414-SLR, September 8, 2010.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiff’s motion to stay is denied.

Continue Reading...

Court declines to include reexamination bar provision in protective order

Xerox Corporation v. Google, Inc., et al., C. A. No.10-136-JJF-MPT, September 8, 2010.

Thynge, M. J.  Plaintiff’s proposed language for inclusion in a protective order is adopted; defendant’s proposed reexamination bar provision is declined.

Continue Reading...

Defendant's oral motion to stay made 11 days before trial is untimely

Belden Technologies Inc., et al. v. Superior Essex Communications LP, et al., Civ. No.08-63-SLR, September 2, 2010.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s oral motion to stay pending reexamination is denied.

Continue Reading...

Letter seeking to strike motions for JMOL is denied as procedurally improper

Leader Technologies, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., C. A. No.08-862-LPS, August 31, 2010.

Stark, J.  Plaintiff’s request to strike defendant’s motions for judgment as a matter of law is denied.

Continue Reading...