Twelve disputed terms are construed for five of the patents-in-suit

Posted on September 20, 2010 by Morris James LLP

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc., Civ. No.07-272-SLR, September 14, 2010.

Robinson, J.  The Court issues a decision construing twelve disputed terms following a Markman Hearing.

The Court construes twelve disputed terms for the five of the patents-in-suit (the “Intermec Patents”).  Although the parties have identified dozens of disputed terms, the court has construed the terms most essential in view of the parties' infringement positions and positions regarding the validity of the Intermec patents and stays construction of the remaining terms pending completion of discovery regarding those patents.
Tags: ,
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/221990
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.