Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., et al. v. Xoft, Inc., C. A. No.10-308-LPS-MPT, October 13, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. The Magistrate recommends that defendant’s motion to transfer be denied.
Continue Reading...Masimo Corporation v. Phillips Electronics North America Corp., et al., Civil Action No.09-80-LPS-MPT, October 6, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. Defendant’s motion to bifurcate and stay damages is denied.
Continue Reading...Aventis Pharma S.A., et al. v. Hospira, Inc., C. A. No.07-721-GMS, September 27, 2010.
Sleet, C. J. The court makes post-trial findings of fact and conclusions of law as follows: (A) claims 2 and 10 of the '561 patent are invalid due to indefiniteness; (B) all asserted claims of the patents-in-suit are invalid due to obviousness; (C) the asserted claims are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct; (D) the asserted claims are not invalid due to double patenting; (E) the defendants' proposed products infringe asserted claims 2, 5, and 10 of the '561 patent and claim 33 of the '512 patent; and (F) each of the parties Rule 52(c) motions are granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...Belden Technologies, Inc., v. LS Corp., et al., Civ. No.08-823-SLR, September 30, 2010.
Robinson, J. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted and the case is transferred to United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Continue Reading...Ricoh Company Ltd., et al., v. Oki Data Corporation, et al., Civ. No.09-694-SLR, September 30, 2010.
Robinson, J. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaims of infringement is denied.
Continue Reading...Stored Value Solutions, Inc. v. Card Activation Technologies, Inc., C. A. No.09-495-LPS, September 27, 2010.
Stark, J. Defendant’s motion to strike the rebuttal report of plaintiff’s
invalidity expert is denied.
Enter keywords:
For more information concerning any of these cases, contact Mary Matterer at mmatterer@morrisjames.com or 302.888.6960
