Mylan's proposed ANDA product does not infringe

AstraZeneca LP, et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., C. A. No. 08-453-GMS, June 23, 2011.

Sleet, C. J.  Post-trial findings of fact and law of non-infringement of proposed ANDA product

This is an ANDA litigation involving Entocort®, which has budesonide as its active ingredient, and involving U.S. Patent No. 5,643,602 (“the ‘602 Patent”).  Plaintiffs, AstraZeneca LP, Aktiebolaget Draco, KBI Inc., and KBI-E Inc., initiated litigation in 2008 and tried the case to the bench in May of 2010.  Defendant, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., is owner of an ANDA seeking approval to sell budesonide enteric coated capsules in three (3) milligram strength prior to the expiration of the ‘602 Patent.  The parties submitted post-trial proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the validity and enforceability of the ‘602 Patent and whether the defendant’s proposed product infringes the patent.  Defendant was found not to infringe the asserted claims of the ‘602 Patent because the evidence at trial, including expert testimony and manufacturing process evidence, demonstrated, inter alia, “Mylan’s product consists solely of: 1) an active core in which budesonide is homogenously distributed and 2) an enteric coating, and further finds that the lactose particles in the active core are not enclosed on all sides by a glucocorticosteroid/polymer coating.”  The court’s findings of fact and law and order did not address the validity and enforceability of the ‘602 Patent.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://depatentlaw.morrisjames.com/admin/trackback/252372
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.