Court does not quash subpoena directed to patent prosecution law firm

Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, C.A. No. 13-104-RGA, April 12, 2013.

Andrews, J.  Motion to quash subpoena is denied.

Law firm that prosecuted the patent at issue moved to quash a third party subpoena for testimony and documents.  The motion was denied.  The bare assertion that nine days was not a reasonable amount of time does not meet the movant’s burden, movant failed to demonstrate how the information sought will be cumulative or intrusive, and a blanket assertion of privilege is insufficient. 

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.

Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.