Versata Software, Inc., et al. v. Callidus Software Inc., C.A. No. 12-931-SLR, May 16, 2013.

Robinson, J. Defendant’s motion to transfer is denied. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is denied.

Defendant moved to transfer the case to the Northern District of California. The motion was denied. The parties are all incorporated in Delaware. Although the case could have been brought in California, the court declined to elevate the defendant’s choice of venue over that of the plaintiffs’ based solely on the defendant’s convenience. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is denied. The complaint identifies the accused software to support a claim for direct infringement. Indirect infringement is also sufficiently pled. The complaint need not identify a particular customer to support a claim for indirect infringement.