Claims are construed in communications patent

Claims are construed in communications patent

Claims are construed in communications patent

Patent claims held invalid due to nonstatutory double patenting

Boehringer Ingelheim Int’l GMBH, et al. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., et al., No. 05-700-JJF, June 16, 2008.

Farnan, J.  After a bench trial, the Court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law.  The Court ruled that disputed claims were infringed, but that the claims at issue are invalid for nonstatutory double patenting.

Continue Reading...

Case is dismissed due to first-filed Texas action naming incorrect affiliate

Remy Inc., et al. v. CIF Licensing, et al., C.A. No. 06-785- (GMS/MPT), June 9, 2008.

Thynge, M.J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss due to pending litigation first filed in Texas is granted.


Continue Reading...

Case is dismissed for lack of standing

McKesson Automation, Inc. v. Swisslogic Holding AG, et al., C.A. No. 06-28-(SLR-LPS), May 30, 2008.

Stark, M.J.  Magistrate recommends that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted due to plaintiff’s lack of standing to sue.


Continue Reading...

Court denies cross-motions for summary judgment on claims for breach of settlement agreement

Non-party is sanctioned for vexatious conduct during discovery dispute

In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litigation., C.A. No. 05-1717 JJF, May 14, 2008.

Farnan, J.  This Court adopts Special Master’s recommendation that non-party be sanctioned for vexatious litigation conduct during adjudication of discovery dispute.


Continue Reading...

Court lacks jurisdiction over interference appeal

Human Genome Sciences, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 07-780 SLR, May 9, 2008.

Robinson, J.   Court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 146 where plaintiff seeks adverse judgment on appeal from concession on priority during interference process.


Continue Reading...

Court issues contempt order against defendant for failure to abide by injunction

Fisher-Price, Inc. v. Safety 1st, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 01-051 GMS (May 5, 2008).

Sleet, C.J.  Plaintiff’s motion for contempt of Court is granted in part; its post-trial motions for entry of final judgment, enhanced damages, attorneys fees and prejudgment interest are granted in part. Defendants’ motions for JMOL or a new trial as to willfulness and damages are denied

Continue Reading...

Case is transferred to Texas where litigation was first filed

Court denies motion to disqualify law firm

Reliant Pharmaceuticals, Inc., v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., C.A. No. 06-774-JJF, April 24, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Plaintiff moves to disqualify law firm from representing the defense based on firm’s previous representation of plaintiff in a related matter.  Court denies motion where representation was limited and did not extend to advice concerning the nature, scope, potential infringement, design around and validity of the patent-in-suit.


Continue Reading...

Subpoena conduct allegations result in evidentiary hearing

Digacomm, LLC v. Vehicle Safety & Compliance, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 08-MC-63-JJF, April 29, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Plaintiff petitioned to enforce a subpoena to the Fish and Richardson law firm.  The Court ordered an evidentiary hearing.to resolve professional issues even if the subpoena issues are fully resolved.


Continue Reading...

Court orders limited discovery on stream of commerce theory of jurisdiction

Power Integrations, Inc. v. BCD Semiconductor Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 07-633-JJF-LPS, April 11, 2008.

Stark, M.J.   Motion to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction is denied and limited discovery on stream of commerce theory of jurisdiction is ordered.

Continue Reading...

Discovery is permitted in review of interference judgment

Human Genome Sciences, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 07-526-SLR-MPT, April 8, 2008.

Thynge, M.J.  The Court agrees to consider priority along with other issues previously presented to the Board of Patent Appeal and Interferences and finds discovery is appropriate.

Continue Reading...

Jurisdiction upheld in declaratory judgment action

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al., v. On Semiconductor Corp., et al., C.A. No. 06-720-JFF, April 3, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Applying new jurisdictional test adopted by the Supreme Court and recent Federal Circuit case law, the Court finds actual controversy sufficient to warrant declaratory judgment action.

Continue Reading...

Inequitable conduct claims survive but false marking claims are ruled untimely

Venetec International, Inc., v. Nexus Medical, LLC, C.A. No. 07-57-MPT, March 28, 2008.

Thynge, M.J.  Court denies plaintiff’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and grants defendant’s motion in part to amend its answer and counterclaim to expand on its unenforceability defense.


Continue Reading...

No infringement, invalidity or inequitable conduct found after bench trial

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., et al., v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., C.A. No. 06-033-SLR, March 31, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Following a bench trial, the Court finds that plaintiff failed to show infringement and is not persuaded by defendant’s claims of invalidity for obviousness and unenforceability due to inequitable conduct.

Continue Reading...

Attorneys' fees awarded in exceptional case

Microstrategy Incorporated v. Crystal Decisions, Inc., C.A. No. 03-1124-MPT, March 25, 2008.

Thynge, M.J.  The Magistrate granted defendant’s motion to rule that this was an “exceptional case” and granted in part its motion for costs and attorneys’ fees.

Continue Reading...

Prior existence of nonexclusive licenses is no bar to standing

Inequitable conduct defense withstands motion to dismiss

Elan Corporation, PLC et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., C.A. No. 07-552-SLR, March 7, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Court denies plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss counterclaims and affirmative defenses relating to claims of inequitable conduct with leave to renew at a later date.

Continue Reading...

Licensee lacked standing where patentee, not a party, retained rights to sue

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, C.A. No. 07-190-SLR, March 7, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Court conditionally grants motion to dismiss where plaintiff licensee lacked standing unless patentee is joined by date certain.

Continue Reading...

Court denies attorney fees in patent infringement case

Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al., v. IVAX Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 03-891-JJF, February 26, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Following a bench trial ruling in favor of plaintiffs’ claims of infringement, the Court denies plaintiffs’ request for attorney fees finding that defendants’ conduct, while sometimes questionable, did not rise to the “exceptional” level.

Continue Reading...

E-mail marketing is a sufficient contact for personal jurisdiction in Delaware

Tristrata Technology, Inc. v. Emulgen Laboratories, Inc, et al., C.A. No. 06-652-JJF, February 25, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Court denies Defendant’s motion to dismiss and transfer venue and holds that jurisdiction and venue are proper where the company targeted sales of allegedly infringing product to Delaware residents as part of national e-mail campaign.

Continue Reading...

Court denies defendants' motion to stay pending resolution of jurisdictional challenge

Power Integrations, Inc., v. BCD Semiconductor Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 07-633-JJF-LPS, February 11, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Court denies defendants’ motion to stay pending resolution of motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction since any efforts taken (including discovery) could be useful in declaratory judgment action pending in Northern District of California between same parties.

Continue Reading...

Motion to amend and to supplement an inequitable conduct counterclaim is granted over futility argument

Plaintiffs win battle over jurisdiction in several related declaratory judgment patent actions

Boston Scientific Corporation, et al., v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., C.A. Nos. 07-333, 07-348, 07-409 and 07-765-SLR, January 24, 2008.

Robinson, J.  The Court denies several motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and motions to transfer in related declaratory judgment patent actions.

Continue Reading...

Post-trial briefing is limited to trial record

TruePosition, Inc. v. Andrew Corporation, C.A. No. 05-747-SLR, January 23, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiff’s motion to register judgment is denied.  Plaintiff’s motion to strike certain evidence referenced in post-trial briefing is granted.  Defendant’s motion to reopen the record on equitable issues is denied.

Continue Reading...

Patent law experts are precluded from trial

Vanderbilt University v. ICOS Corporation, C.A. No. 05-506-SLR, December 20, 2007.

Robinson, J.  The Court rules that the testimony of legal experts will not be permitted at trial.

Continue Reading...

Reconsideration of summary judgment ruling is denied

Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company, C.A. No. 06-091-SLR, December 4, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion for reconsideration of a summary judgment ruling is denied. Miscellaneous pre-trial rulings are made.

Continue Reading...

Court denies plaintiff's motion to reconsider

Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.Com, Inc., C.A. No. 06-491-MPT, January 22, 2008.

Thynge, J.  Court denies plaintiff’s motion to reconsider its prior ruling denying plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim for declaratory judgment.

Continue Reading...

Partial grant of Rexam's motions for summary judgment based on invalidity and non-infringement of beverage can patents

Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. et al., v. Rexam Beverage Can Co., C.A. No. 05-608-MPT, January 22, 2008.

Thynge, J.   Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment of infringement of two patents is granted in part and denied in part.

Continue Reading...

Motion to Reconsider Court's prior ruling on forum shopping denied

Motion to supplement record and request for certification of appealability in two antitrust actions

Motion for a preliminary injunction denied in infringement case

Motion to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction

Plaintiffs have no standing to sue

Sanctions awarded due to improper deposition objections

Promos Technologies, Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., C.A. No. 06-788-JJF, December 20, 2007.

Farnan, J.  The Court grants a motion to compel Defendant to reproduce a 30(b)(6) witness where improper objections were asserted.  Sanctions were awarded. 

Continue Reading...

Claim construction provided only tentative until prayer conference

Claim construction opinion issues in venlafaxine litigation

Summary judgment of infringement granted in beverage container case

Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. et al. v. Rexam Beverage Can Co., C.A. No. 05-608-MPT, December 21, 2007.

Thynge, M. J.  Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment of infringement of two patents is granted in part and denied in part.

Continue Reading...

Sanctions imposed due to contact with employee of opposing party's affiliate

Patentee wins forum shopping contest

Abbott Laboratories, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Cordis Corporation, C.A. Nos. 06-613-SLR and 07-259-SLR, November 28, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiffs' motion to supplement their complaints are denied.  Plaintiffs' motion to enjoin Defendants from prosecuting a New Jersey action is denied.  Defendants' motion to dismiss one action based on a covenant not to sue is granted and the court dismisses the second Delaware action sua sponte in favor of a first-filed New Jersey action.

Continue Reading...

Court makes evidentiary rulings; willfulness and damages are bifurcated

Pfizer prevails in Lipitor battle

Pfizer Inc., et. al. v. Ranbaxy Laboratories, Limited et al., C.A. No. 07-138-JJF, November 29, 2007.

Farnan, J.   Plaintiffs’ motions to dismiss in part declaratory judgment counterclaims and to dismiss and for partial summary judgment on the pleadings are granted.


Continue Reading...

Experts' testimony is limited in golf ball case

Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company, C.A. No. 06-091-SLR, November 20, 2007.

Robinson, J.  The Court grants plaintiff’s Daubert motion.  Defendant’s motion to exclude plaintiff’s expert is granted in part.


Continue Reading...

Patentee prevails on anticipation and breach of contract claims

Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company, C.A. No. 06-091-SLR, November 20, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment of breach of contract and no anticipation are granted.  Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of no breach of contract, invalidity, and incorporation by reference are denied.