Eidos Communications, et al. v. Skype Technologies SA, et al., Civ. No.09-234-SLR, February 24, 2010.
Robinson J. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement is granted in part.
Continue Reading...Jennifer L. Brinkmeier v. Graco Children’s Products Inc., C.A. No.09-262-JJF, February 16, 2010.
Farnan, J. Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff’s Motion For Leave To File Amended Complaint is granted.
Continue Reading...Webxchange Inc. v. Fedex Corporation, et al., C.A. No.08-133a-JJF, January 20, 2010.
Farnan, J. Defendant’s motion for leave to amend its answer is granted.
Continue Reading...Webxchange Inc. v. Dell Inc., C.A. No.08-132-JJF, January 20, 2010.
Farnan, J. Defendant’s motion for leave to amend its answer is granted.
Continue Reading...ICU Medical, Inc. v. Rymed Technologies, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-468-JJF, December 16, 2009.
Farnan, J. Defendant's Motion To Modify Scheduling Order And For Leave To File Second Amended Answer and Counter-Plaintiff's Counterclaims is granted. Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To File Sur-Reply is also granted.
Continue Reading...Mallinckrodt Inc., et al. v. E-Z-EM Inc. and Acist Medical Systems, Inc., C.A. No. 09-228-JJF, December 3, 2009.
Farnan, J. Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended and supplemental complaint is granted; Defendants’ motion to strike is denied as moot.
Continue Reading...Arendi Holding Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, et al., Civ. No. 09-119-JJF-LPS, November 4, 2009.
Stark, M. J. The court will enter a new scheduling order to accommodate new discovery needed on provisional damages. Discovery issues are resolved.
Continue Reading...LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al., v. Whirlpool Corporation, C.A. No. 08-234-GMS, November 9, 2009.
Sleet, C. J. Court grants motion to dismiss certain counts alleged in Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 12(b)(6).
Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp., Civ. No. 08-542-SLR, October 19, 2009.
Robinson, J. Plaintiff’s motions to reconsider dismissal of Lanham Act claim and to amend the pleadings to add an inequitable conduct claim are denied.
Continue Reading...Infineon Technologies AG, et al. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, et al., Civ. No. 08-887-SLR-LPS, September 30, 2009.
Stark, M. J. Plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to additional patents is granted. Costs associated with the motion are denied.
Continue Reading...Laboratory Skin Care, Inc., et al. v. Limited Brands, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 06-601-JJF, August 17, 2009.
Farnan, J. Plaintiffs’ motion to strike Defendants’ motion for Defendants’ motion for summary judgment of unenforceability is granted.
Continue Reading...St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Matsushita Electronic Industrial Co., LTD., et al., Civil Action No. 04-1436-JJF-LPS, July 28, 2009.
Farnan, J. Court overrules Nokia’s objections to Magistrate Stark’s Memorandum Opinion granting plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint.
Continue Reading...Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Versata Enterprises, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 07-782-JJF, July 1, 2009.
Farnan, J. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendants’ counterclaims is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff’s motion to strike is also granted in part and denied in part. Defendants are granted leave to amend their defenses and counterclaims.
Continue Reading...Accenture Global Services GMBH, et al., v. Guidewire Software Inc., Civ. No. 07-826-SLR, June 30, 2009.
Robinson, J. Defendant’s motion to dismiss tortious interference with business claim is denied; its motion to amend its answer to allege trade secret misappropriation claim is granted; and its motion to unseal its proposed amended answer is denied.
Continue Reading...In Re: Rembrandt Technologies, LP Patent Litigation, MDL Docket No. 07-1848-GMS-LPS, June 29, 2009.
Stark, M.J. A motion to amend complaint filed by equipment vendors is granted. The Magistrate Judge further recommends that Rembrandt’s motion to strike or dismiss antitrust counter-counterclaims be denied as moot; and a motion for judgment on the pleadings relating to certain claims filed by the cable defendants be denied.
Continue Reading...St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Research In Motion LTD., et al., Civil Action No. 08-371-JJF-LPS, June 10 , 2009.
Stark, M. J. Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint and Defendant’s contested Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and Counterclaims are granted.
Continue Reading...St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 08-373-JJF-LPS, June 10 , 2009.
Stark, M. J. Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Amend their Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand to add defenses and counterclaims based on inequitable conduct and patent exhaustion and/or license is granted.
Continue Reading...St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Palm, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 06-404-JJF-LPS, June 10 , 2009.
Stark, M. J. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint is granted.
Continue Reading...St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co. LTD., et al., Civil Action No. 04-1436-JJF-LPS, June 10 , 2009.
Stark, M. J. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is granted.
Continue Reading...Roquette Freres v. SPI Pharma, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 06-540-MPT, May 21 , 2009.
Thynge, M. J. Defendant’s motion to amend its answer to add a defense and counterclaim based on inequitable conduct is granted. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a sur-reply is also granted and the arguments set forth therein were considered by the Court.
Continue Reading...LivePerson, Inc. v. NextCard, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 08-062-GMS, March 20, 2009.
Sleet, C.J. Court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personnel jurisdiction. Plaintiff’s motions for jurisdictional discovery and to amend are denied.
Continue Reading...JP Morgan Chase & Co., et al. v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Civ. No. 08-189-SLR, March 4, 2009.
Robinson, J. Defendants’ motion for leave to file an amended answer and counterclaim is granted.
Continue Reading...Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.com, Inc., Civ. No. 06-491-MPT, February 18, 2009.
Thynge, M. J. Magistrate grants in part defendant’s motion to amend to add new inequitable conduct counterclaims.
Continue Reading...St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD, et al., Civ. No. 04-1436-JJF-LPS, February 17, 2009.
Stark, M.J. Defendant’s motion for leave to amend the answer and affirmative defenses is granted.
Continue Reading...Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Zippertubing (Japan), LTD., C.A. No. 06-751-MPT, September 24, 2008.
Thynge, M.J. Court finds defendant’s proposed amendments meet Rule 9(b) requirements and grants motion to amend to add inequitable conduct claims.
Continue Reading...McKesson Automation, Inc. v. Swisslog Holding AG, et al., C.A. No. 06-28-SLR-LPS, August 29, 2008.
Stark, M.J. Following submission of additional documentation, the Court grants plaintiff’s motion to reconsider its earlier recommendation of dismissal for lack of standing. Motions by both sides to amend pleadings are granted. Defendants’ motion to dismiss willfulness claim in light of Seagate is denied.
Continue Reading...Venetec International, Inc., v. Nexus Medical, LLC, C.A. No. 07-57-MPT, March 28, 2008.
Thynge, M.J. Court denies plaintiff’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and grants defendant’s motion in part to amend its answer and counterclaim to expand on its unenforceability defense.
Amgen, Inc., et al. v. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 06-259-MPT, January 31, 2008.
Thynge, M.J. The Court grants plaintiffs’ motion to amend and supplement their counterclaim for inequitable conduct.
Continue Reading...Robinson, J. Plaintiffs' motion to supplement their complaints are denied. Plaintiffs' motion to enjoin Defendants from prosecuting a New Jersey action is denied. Defendants' motion to dismiss one action based on a covenant not to sue is granted and the court dismisses the second Delaware action sua sponte in favor of a first-filed New Jersey action.
Continue Reading...Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc., v. Dexcom, Inc., C.A. No. 06-514-GMS, September 30, 2007.
Sleet, C.J. Defendant’s motion to strike the complaint is denied. Dexcom’s motion to consolidate this proceeding and to stay this proceeding pending reexamination of the seven patents-in-suit is granted.
Enter keywords:
For more information concerning any of these cases, contact Mary Matterer at mmatterer@morrisjames.com or 302.888.6960
