Summary judgment on noninfringment and invalidity is granted in part

Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Civ. Nos.09-72-SLR, 09-232-SLR, July 26, 2010.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiff's motion to amend its pleadings is denied in part and denied in part as moot; defendant’s motion to dismiss Teles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied as moot; SSBG is substituted for plaintiff pursuant to Rule 25(c); plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment of infringement is denied; defendant’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement is granted; trial on the validity of the '453 and '902 patents is stayed pending final judgment by the Federal Circuit on the pending reexaminations; defendant’s motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the '453 and '902 patents is denied without prejudice to renew should the stay be lifted; defendant’s motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the '431 patent is granted; SSBG's motion for partial summary judgment of no inequitable conduct is denied; and both parties' motions to exclude expert testimony are denied as moot.

Continue Reading...

Inequitable conduct amendment is permitted after amendment deadline

Bigband Networks, Inc. v. Imagine Communications, Inc., Civil Action No.07-351-JJF, July 20, 2010.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion to amend its answer and counterclaims is granted. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the amended inequitable conduct counterclaims is denied.

Continue Reading...

Amendment and discovery is permitted in copyright case

Andrew Paul Leonard v. Stemtech Health Sciences, Inc. and John Does 1-100, Civil Action No.08-67-JJF, July 16, 2010.

Farnan, J.  Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery and motion for leave to file an amended complaint are granted.  The court declines to award costs of bringing the motion.

Continue Reading...

Amended complaint alleging sales results in jury trial in pharma case

Sepracor Inc. v. Dey L.P. and Dey, Inc., Civil Action No.06-113-JJF, July 15, 2010.

Farnan, J.  Plaintiff’s motion to file and amended and supplemental complaint and jury demand is granted.

Continue Reading...

Fraud count is amended with particulars in copyright/employment case

Le T. Le v. City of Wilmington, et al., Civ. No.08-615-LPS, July 12, 2010.

Stark, M. J.  Defendant’s motion to amend the answer to allege with greater particularity Defendant’s fraud claim is granted.

Continue Reading...

Motion to file an amended answer and counterclaims is granted

The Research Foundation of State University of New York, et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., C. A. No. 09-184-GMS-LPS, June 28, 2010.

Stark, J.  Defendant’s Motion For Leave To File An Amended Answer and Counterclaims is granted.

Continue Reading...

Late request to add marking and inequitable conduct defenses is granted in part

Leader Technologies, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-862a-LPS, June 24, 2010.

Stark, M. J.  Defendant’s Motion For Leave To Amend Its Responsive Pleading To Add A Defense And Counterclaim Of Inequitable Conduct And To Amend Its False Marking Counterclaim is granted in part and denied in part.

 

Continue Reading...

Supplementation of counterclaims to add new patent is permitted

Masimo Corporation v. Philips Electronics North America Corp., Civil Action No.09-80-MPT, April 19, 2010.

Thynge, M. J.  Defendant’s motion to amend its counterclaims to add a newly obtained patent is granted.

Continue Reading...

Complaint must be amended or face dismissal

Eidos Communications, et al. v. Skype Technologies SA, et al., Civ. No.09-234-SLR, February 24, 2010.

Robinson J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement is granted in part.

Continue Reading...

Failure to plead false marking claims results in partial dismissal

Jennifer L. Brinkmeier v. Graco Children’s Products Inc., C.A. No.09-262-JJF, February 16, 2010.

Farnan, J.  Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff’s Motion For Leave To File Amended Complaint is granted.

Continue Reading...

Leave to file second amended answer after deadline is permitted

Webxchange Inc. v. Fedex Corporation, et al., C.A. No.08-133a-JJF, January 20, 2010.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion for leave to amend its answer is granted.

Continue Reading...

Leave to file second amended answer after deadline is permitted

Webxchange Inc. v. Dell Inc., C.A. No.08-132-JJF, January 20, 2010.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion for leave to amend its answer is granted.

Continue Reading...

Defendant permitted to amend answer to add inequitable conduct claim

ICU Medical, Inc. v. Rymed Technologies, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-468-JJF, December 16, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Defendant's Motion To Modify Scheduling Order And For Leave To File Second Amended Answer and Counter-Plaintiff's Counterclaims is granted.  Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To File Sur-Reply is also granted.

Continue Reading...

Amended and supplemental pleadings are permitted

Mallinckrodt Inc., et al. v. E-Z-EM Inc. and Acist Medical Systems, Inc., C.A. No. 09-228-JJF, December 3, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended and supplemental complaint is granted; Defendants’ motion to strike is denied as moot.

Continue Reading...

Fast-track schedule is bumped for provisional damages and willfulness discovery

Arendi Holding Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, et al., Civ. No. 09-119-JJF-LPS, November 4, 2009.

Stark, M. J.  The court will enter a new scheduling order to accommodate new discovery needed on provisional damages. Discovery issues are resolved.

Continue Reading...

Formulaic recitation of claims is insufficient to defeat dismissal motion under 12(b) (6).

LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al., v. Whirlpool Corporation, C.A. No. 08-234-GMS, November 9, 2009.

Sleet, C. J.  
Court grants motion to dismiss certain counts alleged in Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 12(b)(6).

Continue Reading...

Lanham Act claims are dismissed. Complaint may not be amended after close of discovery

Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp., Civ. No. 08-542-SLR, October 19, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiff’s motions to reconsider dismissal of Lanham Act claim and to amend the pleadings to add an inequitable conduct claim are denied.

Continue Reading...

Amendment of complaint is allowed to encompass additional patents

Infineon Technologies AG, et al. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, et al., Civ. No. 08-887-SLR-LPS, September 30, 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to additional patents is granted. Costs associated with the motion are denied.

Continue Reading...

Inequitable conduct defense fails as untimely

Laboratory Skin Care, Inc., et al. v. Limited Brands, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 06-601-JJF, August 17, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Plaintiffs’ motion to strike Defendants’ motion for Defendants’ motion for summary judgment of unenforceability is granted.

Continue Reading...

Amendment to allege willfulness is allowed

St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Matsushita Electronic Industrial Co., LTD., et al., Civil Action No. 04-1436-JJF-LPS, July 28, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Court overrules Nokia’s objections to Magistrate Stark’s Memorandum Opinion granting plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint.

Continue Reading...

Various counterclaims are dismissed with leave to amend with detail

Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Versata Enterprises, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 07-782-JJF, July 1, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendants’ counterclaims is granted in part and denied in part.  Plaintiff’s motion to strike is also granted in part and denied in part.  Defendants are granted leave to amend their defenses and counterclaims.

Continue Reading...

Court declines to unseal inflammatory answer

Accenture Global Services GMBH, et al., v. Guidewire Software Inc., Civ. No. 07-826-SLR, June 30, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss tortious interference with business claim is denied; its motion to amend its answer to allege trade secret misappropriation claim is granted; and its motion to unseal its proposed amended answer is denied.

Continue Reading...

Antitrust claims permitted in MDL patent dispute

In Re: Rembrandt Technologies, LP Patent Litigation, MDL Docket No. 07-1848-GMS-LPS, June 29, 2009.

Stark, M.J.  A motion to amend complaint filed by equipment vendors is granted.  The Magistrate Judge further recommends that Rembrandt’s motion to strike or dismiss antitrust counter-counterclaims be denied as moot; and a motion for judgment on the pleadings relating to certain claims filed by the cable defendants be denied.

Continue Reading...

Leave to amend Complaint and Answer is granted

St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Research In Motion LTD., et al., Civil Action No. 08-371-JJF-LPS, June 10 , 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint and Defendant’s contested Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and Counterclaims are granted.

Continue Reading...

Amendment adding inequitable conduct defense is permitted

St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 08-373-JJF-LPS, June 10 , 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Amend their Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand to add defenses and counterclaims based on inequitable conduct and patent exhaustion and/or license is granted.

Continue Reading...

Timely request to amend to allege willful infringement is granted

St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Palm, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 06-404-JJF-LPS, June 10 , 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint is granted.

Continue Reading...

Timely request to amend to allege willful infringement is granted

St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co. LTD., et al., Civil Action No. 04-1436-JJF-LPS, June 10 , 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is granted.

Continue Reading...

Inequitable conduct counterclaim is allowed where there was no delay or prejudice to the plaintiff

Roquette Freres v. SPI Pharma, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 06-540-MPT, May 21 , 2009.

Thynge, M. J.  Defendant’s motion to amend its answer to add a defense and counterclaim based on inequitable conduct is granted.  Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a sur-reply is also granted and the arguments set forth therein were considered by the Court.

Continue Reading...

Plaintiff fails to establish that the agency or alter ego theories of jurisdiction apply

LivePerson, Inc. v. NextCard, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 08-062-GMS, March 20, 2009.

Sleet, C.J.   Court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personnel jurisdiction.  Plaintiff’s motions for jurisdictional discovery and to amend are denied.

Continue Reading...

Amendments to answer and counterclaim are permitted over futility argument

JP Morgan Chase & Co., et al. v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Civ. No. 08-189-SLR, March 4, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Defendants’ motion for leave to file an amended answer and counterclaim is granted.

Continue Reading...

Untimely motion to amend to assert inequitable conduct is granted in part

Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.com, Inc., Civ. No. 06-491-MPT, February 18, 2009.

Thynge, M. J.  Magistrate grants in part defendant’s motion to amend to add new inequitable conduct counterclaims.

Continue Reading...

Motion to amend answer is granted 2 1/2 years after action began

St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD, et al., Civ. No. 04-1436-JJF-LPS, February 17, 2009.

Stark, M.J.  Defendant’s motion for leave to amend the answer and affirmative defenses is granted.

Continue Reading...

Court grants motion to amend the pleadings to add inequitable conduct claims

Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Zippertubing (Japan), LTD., C.A. No. 06-751-MPT, September 24, 2008.

Thynge, M.J.  Court finds defendant’s proposed amendments meet Rule 9(b) requirements and grants motion to amend to add inequitable conduct claims.

Continue Reading...

Reconsideration granted; Magistrate recommends finding of standing.

McKesson Automation, Inc. v. Swisslog Holding AG, et al., C.A. No. 06-28-SLR-LPS, August 29, 2008.

Stark, M.J. Following submission of additional documentation, the Court grants plaintiff’s motion to reconsider its earlier recommendation of dismissal for lack of standing.  Motions by both sides to amend pleadings are granted.  Defendants’ motion to dismiss willfulness claim in light of Seagate is denied.

Continue Reading...

Inequitable conduct claims survive but false marking claims are ruled untimely

Venetec International, Inc., v. Nexus Medical, LLC, C.A. No. 07-57-MPT, March 28, 2008.

Thynge, M.J.  Court denies plaintiff’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and grants defendant’s motion in part to amend its answer and counterclaim to expand on its unenforceability defense.


Continue Reading...

Motion to amend and to supplement an inequitable conduct counterclaim is granted over futility argument

Amgen, Inc., et al. v. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 06-259-MPT, January 31, 2008.

Thynge, M.J.  The Court grants plaintiffs’ motion to amend and supplement their counterclaim for inequitable conduct.

Continue Reading...

Patentee wins forum shopping contest

Abbott Laboratories, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Cordis Corporation, C.A. Nos. 06-613-SLR and 07-259-SLR, November 28, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiffs' motion to supplement their complaints are denied.  Plaintiffs' motion to enjoin Defendants from prosecuting a New Jersey action is denied.  Defendants' motion to dismiss one action based on a covenant not to sue is granted and the court dismisses the second Delaware action sua sponte in favor of a first-filed New Jersey action.

Continue Reading...

Stay pending reexamination is granted

Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc., v. Dexcom, Inc., C.A. No. 06-514-GMS, September 30, 2007.

Sleet, C.J.  Defendant’s motion to strike the complaint is denied.  Dexcom’s motion to consolidate this proceeding and to stay this proceeding pending reexamination of the seven patents-in-suit is granted.


Continue Reading...

Declaratory judgment action dismissed as unripe

Angiodynamics v. Diomed Holdings, Inc., No. 06-02 –GMS Sept. 7, 2006.

Sleet, J.  Declaratory judgment action was dismissed due to no justiciable controversy.  A motion to amend the complaint was also denied as futile.


Continue Reading...

Untimely amendment allowed to assert prosecution laches defense, but not inequitable conduct

Inline Connection Corp. v. AOL Time Warner Inc., et al., Nos. 02-272-MPT and 02-477-MPT (consolidated), Aug. 23, 2006.

Thynge, M.J.  The court granted defendants’ motion to amend their pleadings to assert prosecution laches defenses and counterclaims, and denied the motion with respect to three additional inequitable conduct allegations.

Continue Reading...

DJ count dismissed as unripe where accused product lacked FDA approval; stay granted pending reexamination

Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. v. Dexcom, Inc., No. 05-590 GMS, Aug. 16, 2006.

Sleet, J.  Motion to dismiss complaint is granted as to declaratory judgment count, and denied as to infringement count; motion to strike amended complaint is granted; and motion to stay pending reexamination is granted.

Continue Reading...

Trade secret count survives motion to dismiss

Mobius Management Systems, Inc. v. Acartus, Inc., No. 05-346-SLR, June 28, 2006.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion to strike, dismiss and stay amended complaint is denied.

Continue Reading...

New Lanham Act claims added on eve of expert discovery claims permitted

Affinion Net Patents, Inc. v. Maritz, Inc., No. 04-360-JJF, June 8, 2006.

Farnan, J.  Plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint to assert Lanham claims and to dismiss counterclaims based on testimony that accused product was never implemented was granted.

Continue Reading...

Court declined to dismiss, bifurcate or stay antitrust counts and permitted 4 patent claims to be added

Synopsys, Inc. v. Magma Design Automation, No. 05-701-GMS, May 25, 2006.

Sleet, J.  The Court denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss 6 counts of defendant’s amended answer relating to the Sherman Act, Lanham Act and state law claims.  It further denied plaintiff’s motion to bifurcate or stay the antitrust claims from the patent claims.  Defendant’s motion to amend to add four counterclaims of patent infringement was granted.

Continue Reading...

Temporary lack of jurisdiction cured when affiliate was substituted for plaintiff

Affinion Loyalty Group, Inc. v. Maritz, Inc., C.A. 04-360-JJF, May 22, 2006.

Farnan, J.  Defendant moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to a corporate acquisition which assigned rights to patents-in-suit to Affinion Patents, leaving Affinion Loyalty without standing.  The court substituted Affinion Patents for Affinion Loyalty.

Continue Reading...