TruePosition, Inc. v. Andrew Corporation, C.A. No. 05-747-SLR, January 23, 2008.
Robinson, J. Plaintiff’s motion to register judgment is denied. Plaintiff’s motion to strike certain evidence referenced in post-trial briefing is granted. Defendant’s motion to reopen the record on equitable issues is denied.
Continue Reading...Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company, C.A. No. 06-091-SLR, November 30, 2007.
Robinson, J. The court makes evidentiary rulings on issues raised at the pretrial conference.
Crown Packaging Technology, et al., v. Rexam Beverage Can Co., C.A. No. 05-608-MPT, August 28, 2007.
Thynge, M.J. Plaintiffs’ motion for reargument and reconsideration regarding bifurcation of trial is denied.
Colgate-Palmolive v. Ranir, L.L.C., C.A. No. 06-417-GMS, July 31, 2007.
Sleet, C.J. The Court issued an order construing claims in a case involving seven toothbrush design patents and one utility patent.
Continue Reading...Crown Packaging Technology ,Inc., et al., v. Rexam Beverage Can Co., C.A. No. 05-608-MPT, July 24, 2007.
Thynge, M.J. Plaintiffs’motion to bifurcate the trial of defendant’s counterclaims is denied.
Continue Reading...Thynge, M.J. Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss counterclaim based on failure to mark is granted. Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss counterclaims based on laches is denied. Evidence of laches is relevant to willfulness and can be presented to the jury. A portion of the trial may be allocated to make a record for the Court on laches if there is additional evidence to be presented on laches.
Continue Reading...LG. Philips LCD Co., Ltd., v. Tatung Co., et al., No. 04-343-JJF, July 13, 2007.
Farnan, J. Exceptions to discovery rulings relating to willfulness and advice of counsel defenses were sustained.
Continue Reading...Affymetrix, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc., No. 04-901 JJF, Mar. 30, 2007.
Farnan, J. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment regarding claims of intentional interference with economic advantage and unfair business practices was denied. Defendant’s motions for summary judgment of invalidity and inequitable conduct were denied. Claims of unfair business practices were bifurcated from the infringement trial.
Continue Reading...Robinson, J. Motions to transfer venue and consolidate were denied. Motions for extension of time to answer complaints were denied and the answers would be due in 18 days.
Continue Reading...Synopsys, Inc. v. Magma Design Automation, No. 05-701-GMS, May 25, 2006.
Sleet, J. The Court denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss 6 counts of defendant’s amended answer relating to the Sherman Act, Lanham Act and state law claims. It further denied plaintiff’s motion to bifurcate or stay the antitrust claims from the patent claims. Defendant’s motion to amend to add four counterclaims of patent infringement was granted.
Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corp., et al., No. 03-027-SLR, May 11, 2006.
Robinson, J. Juries found for plaintiff against defendants in separate trials. Defendants’ motions for JMOL are denied. Plaintiff’s motion for JMOL or new trial on infringement and invalidity of ‘021 patent is denied. BSC’s motion for reconsideration of the “without prejudice” aspect of order dismissing claims against one product is denied.
Continue Reading...McKesson Information Solutions LLC v. The Trizetto Group, Inc., No. 04-1258-SLR, Apr. 11, 2006.
Robinson, J. The Court rules on bifurcated trial, in limine and discovery issues argued at the pretrial conference.
Enter keywords:
For more information concerning any of these cases, contact Mary Matterer at mmatterer@morrisjames.com or 302.888.6960
