LG Display Co. Ltd. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., C.A. Nos.06-726-JJF, 07-357-JJF, February 16, 2010.
Farnan, J. Following Phase I of a bifurcated bench trial, the court finds that LGD literally infringes the asserted claim in the patents-in-suit and that the patents have not been proven to be invalid.
Continue Reading...Webexchange Inc. v. Fedex Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 08-133-JJF, December 30, 2009.
Farnan, J. Defendants’ motion to bifurcate and for early trial on inequitable conduct is denied. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file surreply is granted.
Continue Reading...Webexchange Inc. v. Dell Inc., C.A. No. 08-132-JJF, December 30, 2009.
Farnan, J. Defendants’ motion to bifurcate and for early trial on inequitable conduct is denied. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file surreply is granted.
Continue Reading...Teles AG Informationstechnologien v. Quintum Technologies, LLC, C.A. No. 06-197-SLR-LPS, October 30, 2009.
Stark, M. J. The Magistrate orders defendants to produce certain damages information within 20 days of the Order.
Continue Reading...
Eurand Inc., Cephalon Inc., and Anesta AG v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al., Civ. No. 08-889-SLR, October 1, 2009.
Robinson, J. Plaintiffs’ motion to sever and stay discovery on antitrust and patent misuse claims is granted.
Continue Reading...Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corp. and Scimed Life Systems, Inc., Civ. No. 03-027-SLR, September 30, 2009.
Robinson, J. After remand following liability trial, the Court orders separate trials before different juries.
Continue Reading...The Dutch Branch of Streamserve Development AB v. Exstream Software, LLC and Hewlett-Packard Co., Civ. No. 08-343-SLR, August 26, 2009.
Robinson, J. The Court determines that bifurcation of damages and willfulness for both discovery and trial is appropriate over plaintiff’s challenge.
Continue Reading...Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp., Civ. No. 08-542-SLR, August 26, 2009.
Robinson, J. Defendant’s motion for bifurcation is granted.
Continue Reading...Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International,Inc. et al., Civ. No. 04-1371-JJF, December 12, 2008.
Farnan, J. Defendant's motion for a new trial on all issues in light of Seagate is granted to the extent it seeks a new trial on willfulness and denied to the extent it seeks a new trial on all issues.
Continue Reading...TruePosition, Inc. v. Andrew Corporation, C.A. No. 05-747-SLR, January 23, 2008.
Robinson, J. Plaintiff’s motion to register judgment is denied. Plaintiff’s motion to strike certain evidence referenced in post-trial briefing is granted. Defendant’s motion to reopen the record on equitable issues is denied.
Continue Reading...Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company, C.A. No. 06-091-SLR, November 30, 2007.
Robinson, J. The court makes evidentiary rulings on issues raised at the pretrial conference.
Crown Packaging Technology, et al., v. Rexam Beverage Can Co., C.A. No. 05-608-MPT, August 28, 2007.
Thynge, M.J. Plaintiffs’ motion for reargument and reconsideration regarding bifurcation of trial is denied.
Colgate-Palmolive v. Ranir, L.L.C., C.A. No. 06-417-GMS, July 31, 2007.
Sleet, C.J. The Court issued an order construing claims in a case involving seven toothbrush design patents and one utility patent.
Crown Packaging Technology ,Inc., et al., v. Rexam Beverage Can Co., C.A. No. 05-608-MPT, July 24, 2007.
Thynge, M.J. Plaintiffs’motion to bifurcate the trial of defendant’s counterclaims is denied.
Continue Reading...Thynge, M.J. Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss counterclaim based on failure to mark is granted. Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss counterclaims based on laches is denied. Evidence of laches is relevant to willfulness and can be presented to the jury. A portion of the trial may be allocated to make a record for the Court on laches if there is additional evidence to be presented on laches.
Continue Reading...LG. Philips LCD Co., Ltd., v. Tatung Co., et al., No. 04-343-JJF, July 13, 2007.
Farnan, J. Exceptions to discovery rulings relating to willfulness and advice of counsel defenses were sustained.
Affymetrix, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc., No. 04-901 JJF, Mar. 30, 2007.
Farnan, J. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment regarding claims of intentional interference with economic advantage and unfair business practices was denied. Defendant’s motions for summary judgment of invalidity and inequitable conduct were denied. Claims of unfair business practices were bifurcated from the infringement trial.
Continue Reading...Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corp., et al., No. 03-027-SLR, May 11, 2006.
Robinson, J. Juries found for plaintiff against defendants in separate trials. Defendants’ motions for JMOL are denied. Plaintiff’s motion for JMOL or new trial on infringement and invalidity of ‘021 patent is denied. BSC’s motion for reconsideration of the “without prejudice” aspect of order dismissing claims against one product is denied.
Enter keywords:
For more information concerning any of these cases, contact Mary Matterer at mmatterer@morrisjames.com or 302.888.6960
