Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Dey Pharma., L.P., et al., Civil Action No.06-113-LPS, January 27, 2012.
Stark, J. Motion for reconsideration granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...Wacoh Company v. Kionix Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 10-617-RGA, January 9, 2012.
Andrews, J. Motion to sever granted; motions to transfer granted.
Continue Reading...Laboratory Skin Care, Inc. v. Limited Brands, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 06-601-LPS, January 3, 2012.
Stark, J. Form of final judgment will be entered by a separate document and bill of costs stricken without prejudice.
Continue Reading...Helicos Biosciences Corporation v. Pacific Biosciences of California, et al., Civ. No. 10-735a-SLR, December 22, 2011.
Robinson, J. Motion to sever or stay is denied.
Continue Reading...Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., et al. v. Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp., Civ. No. 07-779-SLR, December 20, 2011.
Robinson, J. The court issues findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Continue Reading...WebXChange Inc. v. Fedex Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 08-133-RGA, December 15, 2011, and WebXChange Inc. v. Dell Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 08-132-RGA, December 15, 2011.
Andrews, J. Plaintiff ordered to obtain counsel by a specific date and to escrow with the Clerk money to pay defendants’ respective attorneys’ fees and expenses until counsel obtained. Failure to obtain counsel will result in dismissal.
Continue Reading...Sri International Inc. v. Internet Security Systems, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 04-1199-SLR, October 31, 2011.
Robinson, J. In limine and Daubert motions are decided with mixed results before damages trial.
Continue Reading...Ateliers de la Haute-Garonne (French Corp.) and F2C2 Systems S.A.S. (French Corp.) v. Broetje Automation-USA Inc. (Delaware Corp.) Broetje-Automation GMBH (German Corp.) (unsealed), Civil Action No. 09-CV-598-LPS, October 4, 2011.
Stark, J. Summary judgment of invalidity for failure to disclose the best mode of practicing the invention is granted. Motion to strike best mode defense as untimely is denied.
Continue Reading...Belden Technologies Inc., et al. v. Superior Essex Communications LP, et al., Civ. No. 08-63-SLR, August 12, 2011.
Robinson, J. Plaintiff’s motion for JMOL or for a new trial on validity is granted in part and denied in part and its motion for permanent injunction is denied. Defendants’ renewed motion for JMOL or for new trial on invalidity is also granted in part and denied in part. The parties’ remaining JMOL motions are denied as moot.
Continue Reading...S.O.I.TEC Silicon on Insulator Technologies, S.A. and Commissariat à L’Énergie Atomique v. MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., Civ. No. 08-292-SLR, July 13, 2011.
Robinson, J. Post-trial motions are either denied or moot.
Continue Reading...Stored Value Solutions, Inc. (“n/k/a”) Ceridian Stored Value Solutions, Inc. v. Card Activiation Technologies, Inc., et al., C. A. No. 09-495-KAJ (designated), July 1, 2011.
Jordan, J. (designated) Declaratory plaintiff’s motion on invalidity due to anticipation and obviousness is granted in part and its motion for partial summary judgment of invalidity due to lack of written description is granted. Declaratory defendant’s motions for summary judgment of validity and motion to exclude expert testimony are denied.
Continue Reading...St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants Inc. v. Matsushita Electronic Industrial Co., LTD., et al., C. A. No. 04-1436-LPS, June 1, 2011 and St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants Inc. v. Palm Inc., et al., C.A. No. 06-404-LPS, June 1, 2011.
Stark, J. The parties requested withdrawal of a motion for recusal because the Federal Circuit’s claim construction substantially altered the posture of the cases over which Judge Stark presided during his tenure as magistrate. The request was accepted, and the motion for recusal denied with prejudice.
Continue Reading...Abbott Laboratories, et al. v. Lupin Limited, et al., C.A. No. 09-152-LPS (D. Del. May 19, 2011)
Stark. J. The court granted defendants’ motion for leave to file surreply brief in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion to exclude expert evidence and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment of no invalidity for double patenting. The court denied plaintiffs’ motion to preclude defenses not disclosed in the defendants’ interrogatory responses and not contained in defendants’ Paragragh IV notice letter, defendants’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity for obviousness-type double patenting; and plaintiffs’ request to supplement its motion to preclude expert evidence.
Continue Reading...LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Au Optronics Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 06-726-LPS, December 29, 2010.
Stark, J. Third party Anvik’s motion for limited intervention to obtain copies of evidence is granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...Laboratory Skin Care, Inc. and Zahra Mansouri v. Limited Brands, Inc. and Bath And Body Works, LLC, Civil Action No. 06-601-LPS, December 6, 2010.
Stark, J. Plaintiff’s motion to preclude is granted. Plaintiff’s motion to file a surreply is denied. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment under § 102(b) is denied. Remaining portions of defendants’ invalidity motion are denied. Defendants’ motion to bifurcate liability from damages and willfulness is granted.
Continue Reading...Biovail Laboratories International SRL v. Cary Pharmaceuticals Inc., Civ. No.09-605-JJF-LPS, May 26, 2010.
Stark, M. J. Defendant’s motion to strike expert’s supplemental declaration is denied.
Continue Reading...IGT v. Bally Gaming International, Inc., et al., Civ. No.06-282-SLR, April 28, 2010.
Robinson, J. Plaintiff’s renewed motion to dismiss antitrust counterclaims is granted without prejudice.
Continue Reading...Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 08-309-JJF-LPS, July 16, 2009 (Order).
Stark, M. J. Magistrate Judge issues order outlining claim construction procedures.
Continue Reading...Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc., v. Dexcom, Inc., C.A. No. 06-514-GMS, September 30, 2007.
Sleet, C.J. Defendant’s motion to strike the complaint is denied. Dexcom’s motion to consolidate this proceeding and to stay this proceeding pending reexamination of the seven patents-in-suit is granted.
Enter keywords:
For more information concerning any of these cases, contact Mary Matterer at mmatterer@morrisjames.com or 302.888.6960
