Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., et al. v. Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp., Civ. No. 07-779-SLR, December 20, 2011.
Robinson, J. The court issues findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Continue Reading...Sri International Inc. v. Internet Security Systems, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 04-1199-SLR, October 31, 2011.
Robinson, J. In limine and Daubert motions are decided with mixed results before damages trial.
Continue Reading...Kone Corporation v. Thyssenkrupp USA, Inc., et al., Civ. Action No. 11-465-LPS-CJB, September 26, 2011.
Burke, M. J. Motion for leave to take expedited discovery granted in part.
Continue Reading...Solvay, S.A. v. Honeywell Specialty Materials LLC, et al., Civ. No. 06-557a-SLR, September 13, 2011.
Robinson, J. Cross motions in limine to exclude certain characterizations of the patent-in suit made in satellite patent prosecutions are granted. The court resolves other pretrial issues and denies Plaintiff’s motions for reargument
Continue Reading...Xerox Corporation v. Google Inc. and Yahoo! Inc., C. A. No. 10-136-LPS, August 1, 2011.
Stark, J. Defendants’ motion to compel documents withheld as privileged under the common interest doctrine is denied. Court construes patent terms.
Continue Reading...Gian Biologics, LLC v. Biomet Inc. and Biomet Biologics, LLC, Civil Action No. 10-865-LPS, June 21, 2011.
Stark, J. Stay was entered pending completion of discovery on personal jurisdiction and venue issues.
Continue Reading...LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Au Optronics Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 06-726-LPS, December 29, 2010.
Stark, J. Third party Anvik’s motion for limited intervention to obtain copies of evidence is granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...Acceleron, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co. and Intel Corp., Civ. No. 10-128-SLR, December 16, 2010.
Robinson, J. Plaintiff’s motion to complete Rule 56(f) discovery is denied. Its motion to compel documents and testimony is also denied as moot.
Continue Reading...ICU Medical, Inc. v. Rymed Technologies, Inc., Civ. No. 07-468-LPS, November 23, 2010.
Stark, J. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings or partial summary judgment is denied. Plaintiff’s motion to preclude expert testimony is granted. Defendant’s motion to exclude section 282 notice and references is denied. 8 in limine motions are additionally decided.
Continue Reading...Kenexa Brassring Inc. v. Taleo Corporation, et al., Civ. No. 07-521-SLR, November 18, 2010.
Robinson, J. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of patent invalidity is denied. Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment of infringement is granted in part. Vurv products infringe all asserted claims, Taleo products infringe all but two claims of one patent-in suit, and all but one claim of the a second patent-in-suit.
Continue Reading...Ethypharm S.A. France v. Abbott Laboratories, Civil Action No.08-126-SLR-MPT, November 15, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed on discovery matters under the Federal Rules rather than the Hague Convention is granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...Ethypharm S.A. France v. Abbott Laboratories, Civil Action No.08-126-SLR-MPT, November 2, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. Plaintiff’s motion to issue letters of request for depositions of at least six French current or former employees of defendant is granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...Allergan Inc. v. Barr Laboratories Inc.,, et al., Civ. No.09-333-SLR-LPS, August 18, 2010.
Stark, J. After submissions and a discovery teleconference, the court rules on defendants’ motion to compel privileged documents.
Continue Reading...Andrew Paul Leonard v. Stemtech Health Sciences, Inc. and John Does 1-100, Civil Action No.08-67-JJF, July 16, 2010.
Farnan, J. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery and motion for leave to file an amended complaint are granted. The court declines to award costs of bringing the motion.
Continue Reading...Leader Technologies, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-862-JJF, June 24, 2010.
Farnan, J. Plaintiff’s objections to the Magistrate’s discovery order of March 10, 2010 are overruled. Defendant’s objections to the Magistrate’s discovery order of April 27, 2010 are overruled.
Continue Reading...Pronova Biopharma Norge AS v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Civil Action No.09-286-SLR-MPT, April 27, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. Defendant’s motion for issuance of Letters of Request is granted. Plaintiff’s motion to file a surreply is granted.
Continue Reading...Masimo Corporation v. Philips Electronics North America Corp., et al., Civil Action No.09-80-MPT, March 23, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. Defendants’ motion to compel discovery is denied.
Continue Reading...Masimo Corporation v. Philips Electronics North America Corp., Civil Action No.09-80-MPT, April 19, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. Defendant’s motion for reconsideration of its order bifurcating antitrust claims and staying related discovery is denied. The order is amended to bifurcate patent misuse claims and stay related discovery. The court declines to grant a motion to certify a question of law.
Continue Reading...
Eurand, Inc., et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Civ. No.08-889-SLR-MPT, April 13, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. The Court grants defendant’s request for limited discovery only.
Continue Reading...Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Inc., et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al., Civil Action No.08-464-SLR, March 31, 2010.
Bartle, C.J. Defendants’ motion for an order finding that plaintiffs have waived the attorney-client privilege is granted.
Continue Reading...Aerocrine AB and Aerocrine Inc. v. Apieron Inc., Civ. No.08-787-LPS, March 30, 2010.
Stark, M. J. Defendant’s motion to take depositions of foreign inventors in the U.S. is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to produce two NIOX devices is granted in part but limited to one.
Continue Reading...Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp., C. A. No.08-542-MPT, March 19, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. Plaintiff’s motion for reargument is denied
Continue Reading...Masimo Corporation v. Philips Electronics North America Corp., et al., Civil Action No.09-80-MPT, March 11, 2010.
Thynge, M. J. Plaintiff’s motion to bifurcate and stay discovery of defendant’s antitrust counterclaims is granted. Discovery is stayed pending trial on the patent issues.
Continue Reading...
B. Braun Melsungen AG, et al. v. Terumo Medical Corporation, et al., C. A. No.09-347-JJF-LPS, February 25, 2010 (ORDER).
Stark, M. J. Plaintiff’s objections to Defendant’s request to share Plaintiff’s confidential information with its patent law expert are overruled.
Continue Reading...Webxchange Inc. v. Dell Inc., C.A. No.08-132-JJF, February 16, 2010.
Farnan, J. Defendants’ motion to compel withheld documents is granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...Webxchange Inc. v. Fedex Corporation, et al., C.A. No.08-133b-JJF, January 20, 2010.
Farnan, J. Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiff’s Third supplemental Response to Defendants’ Interrogatory No. 1 and for a protective order and motion for leave to file a surreply in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to compel deposition testimony is denied. Plaintiff’s motion to compel deposition testimony is granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp., C.A. No. 08-542-SLR/MPT, December 23, 2009.
Thynge, M.J. Plaintiff’s motion to compel is denied. Defendant’s oral motion to compel raised at the hearing is also denied. Defendant’s motion for leave to file a reply in response to plaintiff’s latest submission is granted.
Continue Reading...Eurand, Inc., Cephalon, Inc. and Anesta AG v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 08-889-SLR-MPT; Eurand, Inc., Cephalon, Inc. and Anesta AG v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., C.A. No. 09-18-SLR-MPT, December 9, 2009.
Thynge, M.J. Defendant’s request for lab notebooks and other R&D documents relating to a product other that covered by the patent-in-suit is denied. Defendant’s request for disclosure of secondary considerations evidence is granted.
Continue Reading...B. Braun Melsungen AG, et al. v. Terumo Medical Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 09-347-JJF-LPS, November 18, 2009.
Stark, M.J. Plaintiff’s request for non-infringement contentions in advance of the deadline in scheduling order is granted. Plaintiff’s request for supplementation of Defendant’s interrogatory responses is denied. Defendant’s request for supplementation of infringement contentions is denied. Its request for discovery relating to conception and reduction to practice is denied.
Continue Reading...Arendi Holding Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, et al., Civ. No. 09-119-JJF-LPS, November 4, 2009.
Stark, M. J. The court will enter a new scheduling order to accommodate new discovery needed on provisional damages. Discovery issues are resolved.
Continue Reading...Innovative Patents, LLC, et al. v. Brain-Pad, Inc., C.A. No. 07-680-MPT, November 4, 2009.
Thynge, M. J. Defendant’s motion for fees and costs relating to the deposition of a 30(b)(6) corporate representative is granted in part.
Continue Reading...Teles AG Informationstechnologien v. Quintum Technologies, LLC, C.A. No. 06-197-SLR-LPS, October 30, 2009.
Stark, M. J. The Magistrate orders defendants to produce certain damages information within 20 days of the Order.
Continue Reading...
Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. Office Media Network, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 08-96-GMS, October 23, 2009.
Sleet, C. J. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is held in abeyance pending jurisdictional discovery. Defendant’s request to take jurisdictional discovery is granted.
Continue Reading...McKesson Automation, Inc. v. Swisslog Holding AG, et al., Civ. No. 06-28-LPS, October 30, 2009.
The Magistrate recommends denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss. Disputed terms are construed following a Markman Hearing. In addition recommendations are made on several competing motions for summary judgment. Finally, the parties’ competing motions to preclude expert testimony are denied.
Continue Reading...Laboratory Skin Care, Inc. and Zahra Mansouri v. Limited Brands, Inc. and Bath and Body Works, LLC, Civil Action No. 06-601-JJF, October 14, 2009.
Farnan, J. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on invalidity is denied. Defendants’ motion for leave to supplement is granted and plaintiffs’ motion to preclude is granted. Further briefing is ordered with regard to defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to §102(b).
Continue Reading...Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corp. and Scimed Life Systems, Inc., Civ. No. 03-027-SLR, September 30, 2009.
Robinson, J. After remand following liability trial, the Court orders separate trials before different juries.
Continue Reading...Eurofins Pharma US Holdings, Inc., et al. v. Bioalliance Pharma SA, et al., C.A. No. 08-613-GMS, September 18, 2009.
Sleet, C. J. Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, failure to state a claim, and forum non conveniens is granted.
Continue Reading...Leader Technologies Inc. v. Facebook Inc., Civ. No. 08-862-JJF-LPS, September 4, 2009.
Stark, M.J. Plaintiff’s request to modify the scheduling order is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant’s request to compel a supplemental response to interrogatory is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff’s request to continue the stay the court’s prior discovery ruling requiring production of source code is denied notwithstanding pending objections to that order before the trial judge.
Continue Reading...Accenture Global Services GMBH, et al. v. Guidewire Software, Inc., Civ. No. 07-826- SLR, July 29, 2009.
Robinson, J. Court rules that it is without jurisdiction to resolve a work product dispute asserted by plaintiff’s attorney representing nonparty at a deposition taken outside this jurisdiction.
Continue Reading...Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v. HRD Corporation (d/b/a Marcus Oil & Chemical), Civil Action No. 05-023-JJF, July 30, 2009.
Farnan, J. Defendant’s motion for discovery abuse sanctions is denied with the costs of defending the motion awarded to plaintiff.
Continue Reading...Hallamore Corporation v. Capco Steel Corporation, Misc. Action No. 08-211-SLR, June 30, 2009.
Robinson, J. Plaintiff’s motion to compel a non-party to attend a deposition and produce documents pursuant to a subpoena issued in Delaware is denied and the subpoena is deemed invalid.
Continue Reading...State of Florida, et al., v. Abbott Laboratories, et al., Civ. No. 08-155-SLR, June 23 , 2009.
Robinson, J. Defendants’ request for discovery relating to rebates received for fenofibrate products is granted.
Continue Reading...SWIMC, Inc. v. Hy-Tech Thermal Solutions, LLC, et al., Civ. No. 08-084-SLR, June 24 , 2009.
Robinson, J. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery is granted.
Continue Reading...Belden Technologies, Inc. v. LS Corporation, et al., Civ. No. 08-823-SLR, June 17, 2009.
Robinson J. Defendants' motion to dismiss for insufficiency of service of process is denied. The Court denies without prejudice defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue in order to allow jurisdictional discovery.
Continue Reading...In re: Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation, MDL No. 08-1949, Civ. No. 07-807-JJF-LPS, June 3 , 2009(redacted).
Stark, M. J. Plaintiff’s motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google, Inc., et al., Misc. No. 07-017-JJF, May 21 , 2009.
Farnan J. Movants’ motion to compel the production of documents by third parties is granted.
Continue Reading...Sea Star Line, LLC v. Emerald Equipment Leasing, Inc., Civ. No. 05-245-JJF-LPS, May 26 , 2009.
Stark, M. J. Magistrate finds initial award of sanctions is appropriate on remand and extends order to include sanctions against both plaintiff and its counsel.
Continue Reading...W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., et al. v.Label Technologies, Inc., C.A. No. 08-111-GMS, May 15 , 2009.
Sleet, C. J. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied. Based on that ruling, plaintiff’s request for jurisdictional discovery is denied as moot.
Continue Reading...Genetics Institute, LLC v. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., Civ. No. 08-290-SLR, May 7 , 2009.
Robinson J. Plaintiff’s motion to set a trial date and defendant’s motion for reargument are both denied pending limited discovery.
Continue Reading...In Re: Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation, MDL No. 08-1949, April 27, 2009.
Stark, M. J. Defendant’s motion to compel certain documents is denied.
Continue Reading...In re: Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation, MDL No. 08-1949a-LPS, May 7 , 2009.
Stark, M. J. Defendants’ application for co-marketing is granted to the extent of plaintiff’s proposed compromise. The Court defers ruling on Plaintiff’s application for a defendant’s research and development efforts to allow for further attempts to compromise.
Continue Reading...Quantum Loyalty Systems, Inc. and Quantum Corporation of New York, Inc., v. TPG Rewards, Inc., Civ. No. 09-022-SLR, April 2, 2009.
Robinson, J. Defendant’s motion to transfer to the Southern District of New York is denied.
Continue Reading...Parker-Hannifin Corporation, et al. v. Seiren Co., Ltd., Civil Action No. 07-104-MPT, March 31, 2009.
Thynge, M.J. Defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees and expenses based on bad faith claim and its request for additional discovery is denied.
Continue Reading...LivePerson, Inc. v. NextCard, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 08-062-GMS, March 20, 2009.
Sleet, C.J. Court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personnel jurisdiction. Plaintiff’s motions for jurisdictional discovery and to amend are denied.
Continue Reading...In Re: Rembrandt Technologies, LP Patent Litigation, MDL Docket No. 07-1848-GMS-LPS, March 6, 2009.
Stark, M.J. Defendants’ motion to retain and use non-party’s purportedly privileged documents was granted where privilege was waived due to lack of diligence.
Continue Reading...CIF Licensing, LLC, d/b/a GE Licensing v. Agere Systems Inc., Civ. No. 07-170-JJF, January 23, 2009.
Farnan, J. Court denies both plaintiff’s motion to compel and defendant’s motion for a protective order.
Continue Reading...CIF Licensing, LLC, d/b/a GE Licensing v. Agere Systems Inc., Civ. No. 07-170-JJF, January 23, 2009.
Farnan, J. Court denies both plaintiff’s motion to compel and defendant’s motion for a protective order.
Continue Reading...CIF Licensing, LLC, d/b/a GE Licensing v. Agere Systems Inc., Civ. No. 07-170-JJF, January 23, 2009.
Farnan, J. Court denies both plaintiff’s motion to compel and defendant’s motion for a protective order.
Continue Reading...Micron Technology, Inc. v. Rambus Inc., Civ. No. 00-792-SLR, January 9, 2009.
Robinson, J. Court declares patents-in-suit unenforceable following bench trial on issues of alleged spoliation of evidence and unclean hands by defendant.
Continue Reading...Human Genome Sciences, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc. and Immunex, Corp., Civ. No. 07-526-SLR-MPT, December 16, 2008.
Robinson, J. Court overrules objection to Magistrate’s Memorandum Order and adopts it in all respects.
Continue Reading...Farnan, J. Court grants non-party’s motion to quash and denies defendants’ application requesting issuance of a letter of request for documents and deposition testimony in Germany under the Hague Convention.
Continue Reading...Robinson, J. Motion to exclude certain expert testimony is granted. Motion to strike affirmative defense of estoppel is deferred.
Continue Reading...In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litigation., C.A. No. 05-1717 JJF, May 14, 2008.
Farnan, J. This Court adopts Special Master’s recommendation that non-party be sanctioned for vexatious litigation conduct during adjudication of discovery dispute.
Digacomm, LLC v. Vehicle Safety & Compliance, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 08-MC-63-JJF, April 29, 2008.
Farnan, J. Plaintiff petitioned to enforce a subpoena to the Fish and Richardson law firm. The Court ordered an evidentiary hearing.to resolve professional issues even if the subpoena issues are fully resolved.
Promos Technologies, Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., C.A. No. 06-788-JJF, December 20, 2007.
Farnan, J. The Court grants a motion to compel Defendant to reproduce a 30(b)(6) witness where improper objections were asserted. Sanctions were awarded.
Continue Reading...LG. Philips LCD Co., Ltd., v. Tatung Co., et al., No. 04-343-JJF, July 13, 2007.
Farnan, J. Exceptions to discovery rulings relating to willfulness and advice of counsel defenses were sustained.
Amgen, Inc., et al., v. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., No. 06-259-MPT, May 14, 2007.
Thygne, J. The Court ordered defendants to produce the foreign-based inventors for deposition in the U.S. in patent declaratory judgment action.
Continue Reading...Block Drug Co., Inc. v. Sedona Labs., Inc. et al.,No. 06-350-***, April 19, 2007
Thynge, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff sought production of 2 agreements between Defendants Sedona and Nutri-Health. Certain portions of an agreement of “Confidentiality of Shared Opinion” were ordered produced after in camera review. A settlement agreement was not required to be produced.
Continue Reading...Affinion Net Patents, Inc. v. Maritz, Inc., No. 04-360-JJF, July 28, 2006.
Farnan, J. Patentee’s motion to compel two claims charts where privilege was waived due to advice-of-counsel defense was denied.
Continue Reading...
Ampex Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., et al., No. 04-1373-KAJ, July 17, 2006.
Jordan, J. Plaintiff’s motion to compel production of privileged documents denied.
Continue Reading...
McKesson Information Solutions LLC v. The Trizetto Group, Inc., No. 04-1258-SLR, Apr. 17, 2006.
Robinson, J. Pretrial order regarding disputed deposition designations.
Enter keywords:
For more information concerning any of these cases, contact Mary Matterer at mmatterer@morrisjames.com or 302.888.6960
