Motions for new trial and JMOL on damages denied after remand.

Cordis Corp. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 97-550-SLR (Consolidated); Boston Scientific Corporation, et al. v. Ethicon, Inc., et al. C.A. No. 98-19-SLR, September 15, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Following decade-long litigation, the Court grants Cordis’ motion for entry of final judgment and denies BSC’s motion for new trial and Medtronic’s motion for JMOL on lost profit damages.

Continue Reading...

Damages remitted and enhanced 25% for willfulness; JMOL defenses waived

TruePosition Inc. v. Andrew Corporation, C.A. No. 05-747-SLR, July 31, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion for JMOL or a new trial is denied.  Damages awarded by jury of $45.3 million are remitted to $18.6 million.  Plaintiff’s motion for enhanced damages due to willful infringement is granted in part.  Damages are enhanced by 25% to $23,250,000.  Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees is denied.  Plaintiff’s motion for a permanent injunction is granted.  Prejudgment interest on $18.6 million is awarded, compounded quarterly at the prime rate.  Post-judgment interest on $18.6 million from 9/19/07 (the date of judgment) is awarded at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the calendar week preceding.

Continue Reading...

Court issues contempt order against defendant for failure to abide by injunction

Fisher-Price, Inc. v. Safety 1st, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 01-051 GMS (May 5, 2008).

Sleet, C.J.  Plaintiff’s motion for contempt of Court is granted in part; its post-trial motions for entry of final judgment, enhanced damages, attorneys fees and prejudgment interest are granted in part. Defendants’ motions for JMOL or a new trial as to willfulness and damages are denied





Continue Reading...

Defendant is enjoined from marketing its DHA products

Martek Biosciences Corporation v. Nutrinova Inc., et al., C.A. No. 03-896-GMS, October 30, 2007.

Sleet, C.J.  The court denies defendant’s motions for JMOL of noninfringement of one patent and invalidity of a second patent .  It granted in part JMOL of invalidity of a third patent.  It further grants plaintiff’s motion for JMOL of infringement of the first patent and for a permanent injunction.


Continue Reading...

JMOL and new trial requests are denied

Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corporation, et al., C.A. Nos. 03-027-SLR and 03-283-SLR, September 24, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Cordis’ motion for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial is denied.



Continue Reading...

JMOL and new trial were denied in stent case

Verdict of DOE infringement withstands reconsideration motion

Defense tactics result in denial of JMOL and new trial motions

JMOL and new trial were denied as the court awarded enhanced damages

IMX, Inc. v. LendingTree, LLC, No. 03-1067-SLR, Jan. 10, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion for JMOL and new trial was denied.  Plaintiff’s motion for enhanced damages was granted.  Plaintiff’s motion for a permanent injunction was denied with leave to supplement briefing.

Continue Reading...

New trial and JMOL on infringement and invalidity were denied

Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. et al. v. Cordis Corp. et al., No. 03-283-SLR, June 15, 2006.

Robinson, J.  Defendants’ motion for JMOL or new trial on infringement and invalidity is denied. Defendants’ motion to strike portions of plaintiffs’ reply brief is granted in part and denied in part.  New arguments are stricken.

Continue Reading...

JMOL and new trial motions denied after verdict of infringement and nonobviousness following remand

Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al., Cons. C.A. 97-550-SLR, May 16, 2006 (corrected).

Robinson, J.  Medtronic’s motion for new trial on Cordis’ patent infringement claims and Medtronic’s invalidity counter-claims, and Medtronic’s motion for JMOL on infringement are denied.

Continue Reading...

Jury verdicts against both parties stand as JMOL is refused

Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corp., et al., No. 03-027-SLR, May 11, 2006.

Robinson, J.  Juries found for plaintiff against defendants in separate trials.  Defendants’ motions for JMOL are denied.  Plaintiff’s motion for JMOL or new trial on infringement and invalidity of ‘021 patent is denied.  BSC’s motion for reconsideration of the “without prejudice” aspect of order dismissing claims against one product is denied.

Continue Reading...