Transfer and dismissal motions are denied; cases are consolidated

Intellectual Ventures I LLC, et al. v. Altera Corporation, et al., C. A. No.10-1065-LPS, January 23, 2012.

Stark, J.  Defendants’ motion to transfer is denied. Defendants’ motion to dismiss or consolidate is denied as to dismissal and granted as to consolidation.

Continue Reading...

Court has subject matter jurisdiction to find patent invalid

Ateliers de la Haute-Garonne (French Corp.) and F2C2 Systems S.A.S. (French Corp.) v. Broetje Automation-USA Inc. (Delaware Corp.) Bröetje-Automation GmbH (German Corp.) Civil Action No. 09-598a-LPS, October 13, 2011.

Stark, J.  Motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied.

Continue Reading...

Covenants not to sue warranted dismissal of counterclaims

Somaxon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 11-107-SLR, July 28, 2011.

Robinson, J.  Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement is granted. Counterclaim Counts III through XIV dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Continue Reading...

Transfer of Intellectual Ventures case is denied

Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Checkpoint Software Technologies LTD., et al., Civ. No. 10-1067-LPS, June 22, 2011.

Stark, J.  Motion to transfer is denied.

Continue Reading...

Limited discovery ordered on motions to dismiss and transfer

Gian Biologics, LLC v. Biomet Inc. and Biomet Biologics, LLC, Civil Action No. 10-865-LPS, June 21, 2011.

Stark, J.  Stay was entered pending completion of discovery on personal jurisdiction and venue issues.

Continue Reading...

Case transferred to New Jersey absent personal jurisdiction

Belden Technologies, Inc., v. LS Corp., et al., Civ. No.08-823-SLR, September 30, 2010.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted and the case is transferred to United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Continue Reading...

Court lacks jurisdiction on one patent due to covenant not to sue; claim construction issues for remaining patents

Belden Technologies Inc., et al. v. Superior Essex Communications LP, et al., Civ. No.08-63-SLR, August 24, 2010.

Robinson, J.  The Court issues a Markman decision on 14 terms for 6 of the 7 patents in suit.

Continue Reading...

Patent case is transferred to California

Boram Pharm. Co., LTD v. Life Technologies Corp., Civil Action No.10-31-HB III, July 14, 2010.

Bartle, J.  (sitting by designation) Defendant’s motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of California is granted.

Continue Reading...

Transfer motion based on "protective" second filing is denied

Pfizer Inc., et al. v. Sandoz Inc., Civil Action No.09-742-JJF, January 20, 2010.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion to transfer is denied. The Court reserves decision on Plaintiff’s motion to enjoin defendant from proceeding with its later filed suit in the District of Columbia.

Continue Reading...

Transfer to California is granted

Qinetiq Limited v. Oclaro, Inc., Civil Action No. 09-372-JAP, December 18, 2009.

Pisano, J.  Defendant’s motion to transfer the litigation to the Northern District of California is granted.

Continue Reading...

Transfer motion is denied despite pending related action where defendants are Delaware corporations

Mallinckrodt Inc. and Liebel-Flarsheim Co. v. E-Z-EM Inc. and Acist Medical Systems, Inc., C.A. No. 09-228-JJF, November 20, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim Under Rule 12(b)(6) is granted as to the indirect infringement claims, but denied as to the direct infringement claim.  Plaintiffs will be given leave to amend.  Defendants’ Motion to Transfer is denied.

Continue Reading...

Consolidated cases are transferred to California

Teleconference Systems v. Proctor and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Civil No. 09-200-JBS/JS, November 25, 2009.

Schneider, M. J.  Cisco's request to stay the Cisco action until its California declaratory judgment action is concluded is denied. Furthermore, Cisco and H-P’s requests to stay and sever plaintiff's customer claims and only transfer plaintiff's claims against Cisco and H-P to California are denied. Except as to the individual defendant, Cisco and H-P’s request to transfer the entirety of these actions to California is granted. Plaintiff's claim against the individual defendant will be severed and stayed and will remain in Delaware.

Continue Reading...

Delaware forum is upheld despite related cases in Illinois

Stored Value Solutions Inc. v. Card Activation Technologies Inc., C.A. No. 09-495-JJF, November 20, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion to transfer to the Northern District of Illinois is denied.

Continue Reading...

Declaratory Judgment Action is dismissed for lack of actual controversy

Microsoft Corporation v. Webxchange Inc., C.A. No. 09-484-JJF, October 30, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted.

Continue Reading...

Court finds no jurisdiction over individual defendant and venue is proper.

CNH America LLC and Blue Leaf I.P., Inc. v. Jon E. Kinzenbaw and Kinze Manufacturing, Inc.,
C.A. No. 08-945-GMS, November 9, 2009.

Sleet, C. J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person and improper venue and to transfer venue is granted in part and denied in part.

Continue Reading...

Motion to transfer venue is denied

Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., and Suros Surgical Systems, Inc., C.A. No. 09-580-JJF, October 15, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Defendants’ motion to transfer venue is denied.

Continue Reading...

Amendment of complaint is allowed to encompass additional patents

Infineon Technologies AG, et al. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, et al., Civ. No. 08-887-SLR-LPS, September 30, 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to additional patents is granted. Costs associated with the motion are denied.

Continue Reading...

Magistrate recommends denial of dismissal and transfer motions

Autodesk Canada Co. v. Assimilate, Inc., Civ. No. 08-587-SLR-LPS, September 29, 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Magistrate recommends denial without prejudice of Defendant’s motion to dismiss, or alternatively for summary judgment or transfer of venue.

Continue Reading...

Contract dispute re: sale of IP is dismissed

Eurofins Pharma US Holdings, Inc., et al. v. Bioalliance Pharma SA, et al., C.A. No. 08-613-GMS, September 18, 2009.

Sleet, C. J.  Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, failure to state a claim, and forum non conveniens is granted.

Continue Reading...

Alter ego theory fails; case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Boston Scientific Corporation, et al. v. Wall Cardiovascular Technologies, LLC, et al., Civ. No. 08-489-SLR, August 24, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction is granted.

Continue Reading...

Objections to Magistrate's transfer and jurisdictional rulings are overruled

Forest Laboratories Inc., et al. v. Cobalt Laboratories Inc., et al., C.A. No. 08-21-GMS-LPS, August 27, 2009.

Sleet, C.J.  On March 9, 2009, the Magistrate issued a report and recommendation regarding certain defendants’ motions to dismiss and, in the event jurisdiction is lacking, plaintiff’s motion to transfer.  The Court overruled the objections and adopted the Magistrate’s rulings.

Continue Reading...

Court lacks jurisdiction to resolve out-of-state deposition dispute

Accenture Global Services GMBH, et al. v. Guidewire Software, Inc., Civ. No. 07-826- SLR, July 29, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Court rules that it is without jurisdiction to resolve a work product dispute asserted by plaintiff’s attorney representing nonparty at a deposition taken outside this jurisdiction.

Continue Reading...

Jurisdictional discovery is allowed following jurisdiction and venue challenges

Belden Technologies, Inc. v. LS Corporation, et al., Civ. No. 08-823-SLR, June 17, 2009.

Robinson J.  Defendants' motion to dismiss for insufficiency of service of process is denied.  The Court denies without prejudice defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue in order to allow jurisdictional discovery.

Continue Reading...

Transfer is denied where jurisdiction is inappropriate as to 16 out of 19 defendant

Safety Braking Corp., et al. v. Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., et al., C.A. No. 07-127-JJF, June 9 , 2009.

Farnan, J.  Defendants’ Motion to Transfer to the Central District of California is denied.

Continue Reading...

Rule 25(c) extends personal jurisdiction to substituted defendant

Quinstreet Inc. v. Parallel Networks, LLC, Civ. No. 06-495-SLR, May 28 , 2009.

Robinson J.  Third-party defendant’s motion to dismiss the third-party complaint is denied; defendant’s motion to dismiss third-party defendant’s declaratory judgment claims for lack of jurisdiction over the person is denied; and plaintiff’s and defendant’s joint motion to dismiss the claims between them is granted.

Continue Reading...

Jurisdiction is proper where accused product sold to Delaware company is sold in components to Delaware plants

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., et al. v.Label Technologies, Inc., C.A. No. 08-111-GMS, May 15 , 2009.

Sleet, C. J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied. Based on that ruling, plaintiff’s request for jurisdictional discovery is denied as moot.

Continue Reading...

Limited discovery is ordered in §291 interference action

Genetics Institute, LLC v. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., Civ. No. 08-290-SLR, May 7 , 2009.

Robinson J.  Plaintiff’s motion to set a trial date and defendant’s motion for reargument are both denied pending limited discovery.

Continue Reading...

Subject matter jurisdiction challenge fails

St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Siemens AG, et al., Civil Action No. 06-403-JJF-LPS, May 4 , 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied.

Continue Reading...

Lack of subject matter jurisdiction challenge fails

St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 04-1436-JJF-LPS, May 4 , 2009.

Stark, M. J.  Hewlett-Packard’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied.

Continue Reading...

Plaintiff fails to establish that the agency or alter ego theories of jurisdiction apply

LivePerson, Inc. v. NextCard, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 08-062-GMS, March 20, 2009.

Sleet, C.J.   Court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personnel jurisdiction.  Plaintiff’s motions for jurisdictional discovery and to amend are denied.

Continue Reading...

Plaintiff jumps the gun in filing declaratory action against patent troll

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Acceleron, LLC, Civ. No. 07-650-SLR, March 10, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted.

Continue Reading...

Transfer recommended where the court lacks personal jurisdiction

Forest Laboratories Inc., et al. v. Cobalt Laboratories Inc., et al., C.A. No. 08-21-GMS-LPS, March 9, 2009.

Stark, M.J.  Plaintiffs’ motions to transfer action as to certain defendants is granted.  Certain defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is dismissed as moot.

Continue Reading...

Delaware corp.'s plea to transfer to forum of second-filed DJ action succeeds

Synthes USA, LLC, et al. v. Spinal Kinetics, Inc., Civ. No. 08-838-SLR, February 24, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion to transfer venue of this matter to the Northern District of California is granted.

Continue Reading...

Objection to M.J.'s report declining to dismiss Defendant's U.S. subsidiary is overruled

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, et al. v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited, et al., MDL No. 08-1949-JJF-LPS, Civ. No. 07-810-JJF-LPS, February 25, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s ruling is overruled and the Magistrate Judge’s disposition of Defendant Aurobindo’s motion to dismiss is adopted by the court.

Continue Reading...

DJ action is dismissed in the absence of actual controversy

Edmunds Holding Company, et al. v. Autobytel Inc., Civ. No. 08-149-SLR, February 20, 2009.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted.

Continue Reading...

Delaware corporation's motion to transfer copyright action is denied

Andrew Paul Leonard v. Stemtech Health Sciences, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 08-67-JJF, December 19, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Defendants’ motion for change of venue is denied.

Continue Reading...

Covenant not to sue does not defeat subject matter jurisdiction

Dey, L.P. and Dey, Inc. v. Sepracor, Inc., Civ. No. 08-372-JJF, January 30, 2009.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied.

Continue Reading...

Magistrate considers several dismissal motions and recommends that they be granted in part and denied in part

In Re: Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation, MDL No. 08-1949-JJF-LPS, November 24, 2008.

Stark, M.J.  Magistrate recommends denial in part and grants in part several motions to dismiss.   Dismissal of agents for foreign entities that submitted ANDAs denied.  Motions to dismiss declaratory judgment count are granted.  Motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction denied without prejudice.

Continue Reading...

No controversy exists where plaintiff disclaims interest in patent

3V, Inc. v. CIBA Specialty Chemicals Corp., C. A. No. 06-593-JJF, 06-629-JJF, 06-672-JJF, November 20, 2008.

Farnan J.  Court grants plaintiff’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denies defendant’s motion for leave of court to serve limited discovery relating to plaintiff’s disclaimer of its patent claims

Continue Reading...

Court lacks jurisdiction over settlement agreement in the absence of order

Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company, Civ. No. 06-091-SLR, November 10, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss breach of contract claim is granted and the grant of summary judgment is vacated.

Continue Reading...

DJ plaintiff's forum-seeking strategy results in dismissal

Innovative Therapies, Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 07-589-SLR/LPS, November 5, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Defendants’ motion to dismiss this lawsuit seeking declaratory relief is granted.

Continue Reading...

Magistrate enters judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b)

Amgen, Inc., et al. v. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 06-259-MPT, October 3, 2008.

Thynge, M.J. Magistrate grants defendants’ motion for judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) and stays plaintiffs’ invalidity and unenforceability claims and defenses pending disposition of the appeal.

Continue Reading...

Covenant not to sue results in partial dismissal of action

Amgen, Inc., et al. v. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 06-259-MPT, September 19, 2008, amended September 26, 2008.

Thynge, M.J. Ariad’s motion to dismiss declaratory judgment action for invalidity is granted.  Motion to dismiss unenforceability defenses is denied.  Ariad’s motion for partial summary judgment on inequitable conduct is granted in part and denied in part.

Continue Reading...

Evidence of intent to serve the Delaware market overcomes jurisdictional challenge

Power Integrations, Inc., v. BCD Semiconductor Corporation et al., C.A. No. 07-633-JJF-LPS, August 1, 2008.

Stark, J. Motion to dismiss is denied following jurisdictional discovery where evidence shows defendant’s intent and purpose to serve the Delaware market.

Continue Reading...

Case is transferred to Arizona due to a hardship

L’Athene, Inc. v. Earthspring LLC et al., Civ. No. 08-114-SLR, August 7, 2008

Robinson, J.  Motion to dismiss is denied; motion to transfer is granted where litigation in Delaware would cause undue hardship to defendant given the small size of its company.

Continue Reading...

Declaratory judgment action is dismissed due to no controversy alleged

Innovative Therapies, Inc., v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., et al., CA No. 07-589-SLR-LPS, July 14, 2008.

Stark, M. J. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted.

Continue Reading...

Case is dismissed due to first-filed Texas action naming incorrect affiliate

Remy Inc., et al. v. CIF Licensing, et al., C.A. No. 06-785- (GMS/MPT), June 9, 2008.

Thynge, M.J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss due to pending litigation first filed in Texas is granted.


 

Continue Reading...

Delaware jurisdiction is proper

LG Philips LCD Co., Ltd, v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics, et al., and AU Optronics Corporation v. LG. Philips LCD, Co., Ltd, et al., C.A. Nos. 06-726 and 07-357-JJF, April 29, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper service of process are denied.  Plaintiff’s motions for sanctions and for leave to take jurisdictional discovery are denied.


 

Continue Reading...

Court orders limited discovery on stream of commerce theory of jurisdiction

Power Integrations, Inc. v. BCD Semiconductor Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 07-633-JJF-LPS, April 11, 2008.

Stark, M.J.   Motion to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction is denied and limited discovery on stream of commerce theory of jurisdiction is ordered.

Continue Reading...

Jurisdiction upheld in declaratory judgment action

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al., v. On Semiconductor Corp., et al., C.A. No. 06-720-JFF, April 3, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Applying new jurisdictional test adopted by the Supreme Court and recent Federal Circuit case law, the Court finds actual controversy sufficient to warrant declaratory judgment action.

Continue Reading...

Prior existence of nonexclusive licenses is no bar to standing

TV Guide Online, Inc., et al. v. Tribune Media Services, C.A. No. 05-725-SLR/LPS, March 26, 2008. (public version)

Stark, M.J.   Magistrate recommends that defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing be denied.

Continue Reading...

Licensee lacked standing where patentee, not a party, retained rights to sue

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, C.A. No. 07-190-SLR, March 7, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Court conditionally grants motion to dismiss where plaintiff licensee lacked standing unless patentee is joined by date certain.

Continue Reading...

E-mail marketing is a sufficient contact for personal jurisdiction in Delaware

Tristrata Technology, Inc. v. Emulgen Laboratories, Inc, et al., C.A. No. 06-652-JJF, February 25, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Court denies Defendant’s motion to dismiss and transfer venue and holds that jurisdiction and venue are proper where the company targeted sales of allegedly infringing product to Delaware residents as part of national e-mail campaign.

Continue Reading...

Court denies defendants' motion to stay pending resolution of jurisdictional challenge

Power Integrations, Inc., v. BCD Semiconductor Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 07-633-JJF-LPS, February 11, 2008.

Farnan, J.  Court denies defendants’ motion to stay pending resolution of motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction since any efforts taken (including discovery) could be useful in declaratory judgment action pending in Northern District of California between same parties.

Continue Reading...

Plaintiffs win battle over jurisdiction in several related declaratory judgment patent actions

Boston Scientific Corporation, et al., v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., C.A. Nos. 07-333, 07-348, 07-409 and 07-765-SLR, January 24, 2008.

Robinson, J.  The Court denies several motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and motions to transfer in related declaratory judgment patent actions.

Continue Reading...

Reconsideration of summary judgment ruling is denied

Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company, C.A. No. 06-091-SLR, December 4, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion for reconsideration of a summary judgment ruling is denied. Miscellaneous pre-trial rulings are made.

 

Continue Reading...

Motion to Reconsider Court's prior ruling on forum shopping denied

Abbott Laboratories, et al., v. Johnson and Johnson, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 06-613-SLR, January 8, 2008.

Robinson, J.  Court denies motion to reconsider prior dismissal order.




 

Continue Reading...

Motion to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction

Energy Transportation Group, Inc., v. William Demant Holding A/S et al., C.A. No. 05-422-GMS, January 4, 2008.

Sleet, C.J.  Court denies renewed motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Continue Reading...

Plaintiffs have no standing to sue

Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, et al. v. Power Integrations, Inc., C.A. No. 07-187-JJF, December 20, 2007.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motions to dismiss for lack of standing are granted without prejudice.

Continue Reading...

Patentee wins forum shopping contest

Abbott Laboratories, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Cordis Corporation, C.A. Nos. 06-613-SLR and 07-259-SLR, November 28, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiffs' motion to supplement their complaints are denied.  Plaintiffs' motion to enjoin Defendants from prosecuting a New Jersey action is denied.  Defendants' motion to dismiss one action based on a covenant not to sue is granted and the court dismisses the second Delaware action sua sponte in favor of a first-filed New Jersey action.

Continue Reading...

Pfizer prevails in Lipitor battle

Pfizer Inc., et. al. v. Ranbaxy Laboratories, Limited et al., C.A. No. 07-138-JJF, November 29, 2007.

Farnan, J.   Plaintiffs’ motions to dismiss in part declaratory judgment counterclaims and to dismiss and for partial summary judgment on the pleadings are granted.


 

Continue Reading...

Actual controversy exists despite removal of accused references from website

Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.com.Inc., C.A. No. 06-491-MPT, November 20, 2007.

Thynge, M.J.  Motion to dismiss counterclaim of infringement on the basis of no actual controversy is denied.


 

Continue Reading...

Case dismissed due to first-filed action in Texas against related party

Time Warner Cable, Inc., v. USA Video Technology Corp., C.A. No. 06-387-***, October 31, 2007.

Thynge, M.J.   Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in favor of a first filed action in Texas is granted.  The motion to stay or transfer to Texas is denied as moot.  Plaintiff’s motion to enjoin duplicative litigation is denied as moot.


Continue Reading...

Covenant not to sue moots first of two challenges to subject matter jurisdiction

Abbott Laboratories, et al., v. Johnson and Johnson, et al., C.A. No. 06-613-SLR, September 27, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Defendants’ first motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied as moot.  Decision on second motion filed after covenant not to sue was executed remains pending.


 

Continue Reading...

Summary judgment in antitrust action is denied; jurisdictional and venue defenses are upheld

Howard Hess Dental, et al., v. Dentsply International, Inc., C.A. Nos. 99-255-SLR and 01-267, September 26, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.  Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue is granted.

Continue Reading...

Transfer to forum of first-filed action is granted

Bank of America, N.A., v. S.I.P. Assets, LLC et al., C.A. No. 07-159-GMS, September 11, 2007.

Sleet, C.J.  Defendant EPC’s motion to transfer is granted.  Defendant SIP’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied as moot.

Continue Reading...

Antitrust claims were governed by forum selection clause

Pullen Seeds and Soil v. Monsanto Company, C.A. No. 06-599; Wade Farms, et al., v. Monsanto Company., C.A. No. 06-600-SLR, July 18, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss antitrust claims is granted.

Continue Reading...

This Court has no jurisdiction over German parent of Delaware subsidiaries

Syed Iqbal Raza, M.D. v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 06-132-JJF, July 23, 2007.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss German parent corporation for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted.

Continue Reading...

Dismissal granted based on first-to-file rule

Time Warner Cable v. GPNE Corp., C.A. No. 07-67-MPT, July 20, 2007.

Thynge, M.J.   Defendant’s motion to dismiss in light of prior pending action was granted.  The motion to stay or transfer was denied as moot.

Continue Reading...

ANDA case dismissed over generic company's objection

Merck & Co., Inc. v. Apotex, Inc., No. 06-230-GMS, May 21, 2007.

Sleet, J.  The Court dismissed the action where actual controversy was resolved by plaintiff’s execution of covenant not to sue.

Continue Reading...

Transfer to Texas where related litigation was nearing conclusion was denied

Oracle Corp. et al. v. EpicRealm Licensing, LP, No. 06-414-SLR; QuinStreet, Inc. v. EpicRealm Licensing, LP, 06-495-SLR, Mar. 26, 2007.

Robinson, J.  Motions to transfer venue and consolidate were denied.  Motions for extension of time to answer complaints were denied and the answers would be due in 18 days. Continue Reading...

Institutional holders of patent rights were held not indispensable in suit against exclusive licensee

Amgen, Inc. et al. v. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 06-259-MPT, Mar. 27, 2007.

Thynge, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to join a party, or alternatively to transfer, was denied.

Continue Reading...

Court declined to order recall of privileged document after untimely request; draft licensing agreement was subject to recall

In Re:  '318 Patent Infringement Litigation, No. 05-356-SLR, Mar. 1, 2007.

Robinson, J.   A motion seeking return or destruction of privileged documents inadvertently produced was granted in part and denied in part.

Continue Reading...

Threatening letter sufficient to establish actual controversy

Epic Systems Corporation v. Acacia Research Corporation et al., No. 06-255-JJF, Nov. 16, 2006.

Farnan, J.  Motion to dismiss or transfer venue is granted in part and denied in part.

 

Continue Reading...

Threat against Chinese affiliate provided reasonable apprehension of suit by American company importing accused product

Positec USA Inc. et al. v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp., No. 05-890 GMS, Sept. 25, 2006.

Sleet, J.  The court denied a motion to dismiss this declaratory judgment action alleged to be unripe due to no objectively reasonably apprehension of imminent suit.

Continue Reading...

Declaratory judgment action dismissed as unripe

Angiodynamics v. Diomed Holdings, Inc., No. 06-02 –GMS Sept. 7, 2006.

Sleet, J.  Declaratory judgment action was dismissed due to no justiciable controversy.  A motion to amend the complaint was also denied as futile.


Continue Reading...

Licensing dispute pursuant to European standard-setting procedures was remanded to Chancery Court

Nokia Corp. et al. v. Qualcom, Inc., No. 06-509-JJF, Aug. 29, 2006.

Farnan, J.  Motion to remand to Chancery Court for interpretation of contractual agreements is granted in the absence of a substantial question of patent law.

Continue Reading...

DJ count dismissed as unripe where accused product lacked FDA approval; stay granted pending reexamination

Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. v. Dexcom, Inc., No. 05-590 GMS, Aug. 16, 2006.

Sleet, J.  Motion to dismiss complaint is granted as to declaratory judgment count, and denied as to infringement count; motion to strike amended complaint is granted; and motion to stay pending reexamination is granted.

Continue Reading...

Consulting agreement provided standing to bring suit

Affymetrix, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc., No. 04-901-JJF, Aug. 16, 2006.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss count II relating to U.S. Patent No. 5,795,716 because of lack of title to the ‘716 patent and therefore lack of standing was denied.

 

Continue Reading...

Stream of commerce insufficient basis for personal jurisdiction over foreign holding companies

Monsanto v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al., No. 04-305-SLR, Aug. 4, 2006. 

Robinson, J.  Syngenta foreign holding companies’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted. The disputed technology involves glyphosate-tolerant corn.

 

Continue Reading...

Case remanded to Chancery Court after dismissal of Lanham Act claims

Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. v. Albermarle Corp., Inc., No. 05-892-JJF, June 8, 2006.

Farnan, J.  Defendant’s motion to dismiss Lanham Act claims was granted.  Supplemental state court claims were remanded to the Court of Chancery.

Continue Reading...

Covenant not to sue allows plaintiff to dismiss its patent suit with prejudice

Merck & Co., Inc. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc., No. 658-GMS, June 2, 2006.

Sleet, J.  Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss its patent suit with prejudice is granted after plaintiff gave defendant a covenant not to sue.

Continue Reading...

Temporary lack of jurisdiction cured when affiliate was substituted for plaintiff

Affinion Loyalty Group, Inc. v. Maritz, Inc., C.A. 04-360-JJF, May 22, 2006.

Farnan, J.  Defendant moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to a corporate acquisition which assigned rights to patents-in-suit to Affinion Patents, leaving Affinion Loyalty without standing.  The court substituted Affinion Patents for Affinion Loyalty.

Continue Reading...

Declaratory judgment action dismissed where plaintiff had no reasonable apprehension of suit

Fairplay Electric Cars, LLC v. Textron Innovations, Inc., No. 06-60-JJF, May 15, 2006.

Farnan, J.  Georgia court preliminarily enjoined Fairplay from marketing golf cars.  Fairplay sought a declaratory judgment of non-infringement in Delaware relating to a golf car not accused in the Georgia action.  Textron moved to dismiss, transfer, or stay the second-filed Delaware action.  The motion was granted.

Continue Reading...

One plaintiff transferred to Texas where first-filed action was pending; the rest remain in Delaware

Sony Electronics, Inc. et al. v. Orion IP, LLC, No. 05-255-GMS, Mar. 14, 2006.

Sleet, J.  Motion to dismiss or stay under first-filed rule is granted in part and denied in part.  Claims of plaintiff who was a party to Texas action were severed and transferred.



 

Continue Reading...

Delaware the wrong forum for inventorship dispute

St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Mirage Systems, Inc. et al., No. 05-273-JJF, Mar. 8, 2006.

Farnan, J.  Motion to dismiss claims against individual defendants for improper venue granted. Defendants’ motion to dismiss or stay is granted.

Continue Reading...