Xerox Corporation v. Google Inc. and Yahoo! Inc., C. A. No. 10-136-LPS, August 1, 2011.
Stark, J. Defendants’ motion to compel documents withheld as privileged under the common interest doctrine is denied. Court construes patent terms.
Continue Reading...Allergan Inc. v. Barr Laboratories Inc.,, et al., Civ. No.09-333-SLR-LPS, August 18, 2010.
Stark, J. After submissions and a discovery teleconference, the court rules on defendants’ motion to compel privileged documents.
Continue Reading...Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Inc., et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al., Civil Action No.08-464-SLR, March 31, 2010.
Bartle, C.J. Defendants’ motion for an order finding that plaintiffs have waived the attorney-client privilege is granted.
Continue Reading...Webxchange Inc. v. Dell Inc., C.A. No.08-132-JJF, February 16, 2010.
Farnan, J. Defendants’ motion to compel withheld documents is granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...Accenture Global Services GMBH, et al. v. Guidewire Software, Inc., Civ. No. 07-826- SLR, July 29, 2009.
Robinson, J. Court rules that it is without jurisdiction to resolve a work product dispute asserted by plaintiff’s attorney representing nonparty at a deposition taken outside this jurisdiction.
Continue Reading...State of Florida, et al., v. Abbott Laboratories, et al., Civ. No. 08-155-SLR, June 23 , 2009.
Robinson, J. Defendants’ request for discovery relating to rebates received for fenofibrate products is granted.
Continue Reading...Promos Technologies, Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., C.A. No. 06-788-JJF, December 20, 2007.
Farnan, J. The Court grants a motion to compel Defendant to reproduce a 30(b)(6) witness where improper objections were asserted. Sanctions were awarded.
Continue Reading...Enter keywords:
For more information concerning any of these cases, contact Mary Matterer at mmatterer@morrisjames.com or 302.888.6960
