Parker-Hannifin Corporation, et al. v. Seiren Co., Ltd., Civil Action No. 07-104-MPT, March 31, 2009.
Thynge, M.J. Defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees and expenses based on bad faith claim and its request for additional discovery is denied.
Continue Reading...In Re: Rembrandt Technologies, LP Patent Litigation, MDL Docket No. 07-1848-GMS-LPS, March 6, 2009.
Stark, M.J. Defendants’ motion to retain and use non-party’s purportedly privileged documents was granted where privilege was waived due to lack of diligence.
Continue Reading...Human Genome Sciences, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., Civ. No. 08-166-SLR, December 16, 2008.
Robinson, J. Defendant’s motion to dismiss review of decisions by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences is granted.
Continue Reading...Martek Biosciences Corporation v. Nutrinova Inc., et al., C.A. No. 03-896-GMS, October 30, 2007.
Sleet, C.J. The court denies defendant’s motions for JMOL of noninfringement of one patent and invalidity of a second patent . It granted in part JMOL of invalidity of a third patent. It further grants plaintiff’s motion for JMOL of infringement of the first patent and for a permanent injunction.
Block Drug Co., Inc. v. Sedona Labs., Inc. et al.,No. 06-350-***, April 19, 2007
Thynge, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff sought production of 2 agreements between Defendants Sedona and Nutri-Health. Certain portions of an agreement of “Confidentiality of Shared Opinion” were ordered produced after in camera review. A settlement agreement was not required to be produced.
Continue Reading...In Re: '318 Patent Infringement Litigation, No. 05-356-SLR, Mar. 1, 2007.
Robinson, J. A motion seeking return or destruction of privileged documents inadvertently produced was granted in part and denied in part.
Continue Reading...Affinion Net Patents, Inc. v. Maritz, Inc., No. 04-360-JJF, July 28, 2006.
Farnan, J. Patentee’s motion to compel two claims charts where privilege was waived due to advice-of-counsel defense was denied.
Continue Reading...
Forest Laboratories, Inc. v. Ivex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 03-891-JJF July 25, 2006.
Farnan, J. After a bench trial, the court sustained about 10 out of 30 evidentiary objections after post-trial briefing.
Continue Reading...
Ampex Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., et al., No. 04-1373-KAJ, July 17, 2006.
Jordan, J. Plaintiff’s motion to compel production of privileged documents denied.
Continue Reading...
Corning Inc., et al., v. SRU BioSystems, et al., No. 03-633-JJF, Jan. 20, 2006.
Farnan, J. Motion for reconsideration of prior rulings on invalidity for lack of written description and indefiniteness is denied.
Continue Reading...Enter keywords:
For more information concerning any of these cases, contact Mary Matterer at mmatterer@morrisjames.com or 302.888.6960
